DAVID BOIES. On behalf of the Lord and Creator of the Universe, I'd like to welcome you all, and I'd like to thank Capitol Records for allowing us to use their facilities for this unprecedented event. I will read a short statement approved by my client, and then we will take some of your questions. Here's the text of the statement:

"I understand that many many people around the world are not pleased with certain happenings that have occurred in recent months and years. I wish to state for the record that I sympathize with all those who have suffered and are suffering. I further wish to state that said suffering has been caused in large part not by divine intention, but by human error. I therefore cannot accept responsibility or liability for any losses, damages, or reparations that might be owed to individual human beings. I will now attempt to answer questions, although under advice of counsel, I must warn you that I cannot speak to specifics which may be pertinent to future litigation."

My office will give you copies of the text afterwards. We'll proceed now to the question-and-answer phase. Yes, Chris, you had your hand up?

CHRIS MATTHEWS, MSNBC. To touch on what is occupying everyone's attention today, I'd like to say that I'm a good Catholic except for being pro-choice, and it's an honor to meet you. I want to ask about Hurricane Katrina, which is only the latest in a pattern of increasingly violent weather, including the recent tsunami, that has killed hundreds of thousands of Asians as well as hundreds of Americans in the southern states. Do you accept any responsibility for these catastrophes, or is it rather the case that human -- and especially American leadership -- has so failed in its planning and execution of environmental policy, as well as foreign policy, that you really can't be blamed?

GOD. That's exactly right, Chris. A certain amount of weather is normal, of course, but what we've seen lately is outrageous by any standard. Your scientists long ago identified the danger of global warming caused by human-generated greenhouse gases, and most of the world's nations were prepared to solve the crisis with the Kyoto protocols. The United States in particular has chosen to ignore climate change and the extreme storms it might generate, and now you are paying the price. I had nothing to do with it. Oh, and Chris, did anyone ever tell you you talk too much? Less is more, believe me.

AN NG, HANOI CITY TIMES. Two questions. Are you saying that the terrible loss of life we've experienced due to weather is the fault of the greedy running dog capitalists of the west, and by this I mean specifically George Bush of the United States? And if so, why is it that weather in Asia kills hundreds of thousands and in America only hundreds, if that?

GOD. The answer to your first question is yes, although I cannot mention individual names because of legal considerations, you understand. The answer to your second question is somewhat more complicated. Unfortunately for many, the United States is the most powerful and influential nation in the world, and its will is therefore imposed -- rightly or wrongly -- on billions who are powerless to disagree. What has been clear for almost half a century now is that the American people -- and their institutions, including the Supreme Court of the United States -- have decided that no American citizen should die from any cause, including disease, old age, natural catastrophe, plane crash, auto accident, war, et cetera. I used to have the power to intervene at times in such affairs, but the American supreme court has, in a long series of decisions, eliminated my right to do so. It is, at this point, illegal for me to correct the imbalance of death and suffering that exists between the United States and the poorer nations of the world. Soon, I expect, the more progressive Americans will pass laws that prevent me from afflicting any American with any ailment or injury under any circumstances. Such is the power of western liberalism. My hands are tied.

AHMED SIH, AL JAZEERA. I must confess that I am very disappointed to hear you speak in this way. Are you not Allah, who chose the Prophet Muhammed as his voice and strong right arm? I hear you condemn the selfishness and greed of the infidel Americans, but I do not hear you promise the vengeance, bloodshed, and justice we have learned from Muhammed to expect. What is your explanation of the war of aggression fought by Americans against my Arab brethren, and what are you going to do about it?

DAVID BOIES. Give us a moment. (Thirty to forty seconds of typing by Boies, followed by an interval of silence and more typing.)

GOD. On your knees, Ahmed Sih! Who are you to question Allah, Lord of Creation? There's only one question you should concern yourself with: how might YOU submit to MY will more perfectly. I shall deal with the Americans in my own way, in my own time. That is all.

MAUREEN DOWD, WASHINGTON POST. Speaking of the war in Iraq, could you comment on the despicable behavior of a president who takes months and months of vacations while American children are dying in the Sunni Triangle?

DAVID BOIES. Give us another moment. (More typing, etc).

GOD. I have no comment at this time, except that you really do need to break it off with Don. He's just playing you.

ANN COULTER. Quit shrieking, Modo. If this is really God, he's drunk or just killing time. How could he resist an opportunity to mess with a ship of fools like this one? Me, I have no questions he's in any mood to answer.

GOD. Hi, Ann. Like your skirt. And thanks for the beaucoup laughs. I have no answers you're in any mood to question. So there.

PAT ROBERTSON, CHRISTIAN BROADCASTING. I regret to tell you, O Lord, that like Ahmed Sih -- and unlike Ann Coulter, apparently -- I am grievously disappointed to hear you speak in this way. Since when are you bound by the sinful rulings of the Supreme Court? Does this mean that you will do nothing to end the holocaust of abortion and the immoral spread of a secularism which even denies you credit for Creation itself? Are you simply going to stand by and watch us fall into decay and hellish ruin? Is there no hope for us?

GOD. Hey, Pat. Chill. You really should have paid more attention in your science classes at Yale. Or didn't you take any? Do you really think I have the kind of time it would take to be the personal totem you make me out to be? That I'm available every second to improve your personal finances, make your wife understand you better, and punish all the other sinful beings you fancy more sinful than yourself? Your scientists aren't idiots, you know. They're pretty close to the mark when they describe Creation as an ancient moment when certain natural laws were set in motion, so that things could progress pretty much on their own afterwards. Do you imagine that I deliberately designed the duckbilled platypus? Pfui. And if I really were the kind of personal deity you say I am, why would I care about a few fetuses when I have been doling out plagues, wars, and irreparable heartbreaks of every kind since the dawn of your sorry history? Grow up. And while you're at it, quit pretending to speak for my son. He's as sick of it as I am.

STEVE DOUCY, FOX NEWS. Excuse me, sir. I'm a weatherman for the Fox News Channel, so forgive me if I ask a question that's a little off topic. You seemed to be blaming the tsunami on George Bush -- maybe not in so many words, but effectively, if you know what I mean -- and the thing is, the tsunami wasn't a weather event, per se. It was caused by an earthquake. Earthquakes aren't caused by global warming, are they?

GOD. I know it's in the nature of your puny species to obsess about details. I don't. I'm the Big Picture type. If you really want to know, I couldn't care less about HOW tsunamis and hurricanes are the fault of the American government. They just are. You'll have to take my word for it.

PAUL KRUGMAN, NEW YORK TIMES. Isn't the situation with Hurricane Katrina really an extraordinary nexus of numerous strands of incompetence by this administration? Isn't it possible that you played some part in arranging a kind of expose of Bush and his cronies -- to demonstrate in vivid terms that he caused the hurricane by blowing off Kyoto and then made it impossible to formulate an effective response because all the National Guard troops are in Iraq, and people can't even get away because of his mismanagement of gas prices? Are you sure you're not trying to tell us something with all this? And could you comment on the two successive presidential elections that have been stolen by this criminal?

DAVID BOIES. These are all matters that are too specific for divine comment, Paul. (Boies consults the computer screen.) Although God does offer an aside. He says, and I quote, "I thought you were an economist, Krugman. Did I miss something?"

SIMON FREAS, WALL STREET JOURNAL. Speaking of economics, could you comment on the housing market? Are we in the midst of a real estate bubble that's about to collapse? A simple yes or no will do.

GOD. Personally I'd advise diversifying into equity markets and, as an inflation hedge, money market funds.

RANDI RHODES, AIR AMERICA. I can't believe you ducked that question about Iraq. Now you're exchanging chit-chat with corporate fascists. Incredible. I demand to know why you humiliated Ahmed Sih like that. He's the victim here. His country has been invaded by imperialist aggressors, and you diss him like some punk Republican. Where were you during Abu Ghraib? Holding the camera? I'm not saying I believe in you anyway, but in case you do exist, I have to ask you on behalf of all the grieving mothers in the world, what DO you have to say about that evil, lying monster George W. Bush and the illegal, genocidal war against Arabs in Iraq? What about the weapons of mass destruction that weren't there? What about--

GOD. Silence, riblet. If you knew how to read between the lines at all, you'd see that I've already made it clear I have nothing to do with the war in Iraq. I don't "hold cameras." And where do you get off talking to me like that? Of course I exist. But if I don't care about a few million aborted fetuses, why would I care about a few hundred grieving mothers? You can't have it both ways  -- unless you're, and that's right, you ARE -- an American. Even if you pretend you really aren't. And if I want to humiliate a boring fanatic from al jazeera, it's no skin off your nose, is it? My question to you is, what is it exactly you're so pissed off about? Haven't I said practically everything you'd want me to say -- that everything wrong on the planet is the fault of your President, that I'm powerless against the self-appointed demigods of your Harvard Law School, that I don't give a rat's ass about the Right to Life, and that I, the Creator of the Universe, have chosen to arbitrarily limit my power to that of initial cause, thus confirming that everyone and everything you see around you is the spectacular accident you prefer it to be? Is there no end to your self-serving demands? What if I told you that I'm only holding this idiotic press conference in the first place because my attorneys suggested it -- that they were paranoically concerned that I'd experience a PR backlash from Hurricane Katonah, or whatever you call it, because I dared to splash a few of your cities as part of my Grand Plan for--

BOIES. (clicking off the computer terminal) Excuse me, I think I'd better call it a day right there. I'd ask you to disregard the last few statements. God has been very upset about the recent weather events in the south, and he's close to total exhaustion. Thank you, thank you, for your time. Don't forget your copies of the official release....

Remember this name: Vonn Fe'ao

If you were watching closely FoxNews coverage of the Kfar Darom Expulsion, you would have seen among the media pool Radical Leftist MICHAEL MOORE, famous propagandist Hollywood director, standing outside the Kfar Darom Synagogue with a smirk and his video camera, shooting humiliating video footage of the Jews being dragged out of the Synagogue, to show his friends, the peace-loving Palestinians, Moveon.org and the ISM.

Politics have again made for strange bedfellows: Michael Moore cares about a Dead White Guy. Moore is among the internationalist socialists and anti-U.S. fanatics supporting protest operations in Crawford, Texas, outside President Bush’s ranch.

The protest’s figurehead is Cindy Sheehan whose son, Casey, was a soldier killed in Iraq in April 2004. An obliging media portrays Sheehan as one-woman-making-a-difference, but Moore and groups such as Code Pink-Women For Peace, MoveOn.org and others orchestrate the events and publicity.

Anti-war protestors besieged wounded and disabled soldiers at Walter Reed Hospital in Washington, D.C, a new web report will claim!

CNSNews.com is planning to run an expose on Thursday featuring interviews with both protestors and veterans, as well as shots of protest signs with slogans like “Maimed for a Lie.”

The conservative outlet will post video evidence of the wounded veterans being taunted by protesters, the DRUDGE REPORT has learned.

Michael & Me," my self-financed, independent film, recently debuted on Amazon.com.

Michael Moore argues that America possesses "too many guns." If so, why in the last 20 years -- with gun ownership up -- has violent crime declined in America? Liberals believe gun control reduces crime. Does it? What about the effect on urban crime when cities outlaw so-called "cheap Saturday night specials"?

How often do Americans use guns for defensive purposes? I wanted to put this question to Moore. He tells us, for example, that over 11,000 people die each year because of guns. But how many Americans credit their lives with their ability to use a gun to defend themselves?

"Michael & Me" asks why, if America possesses "too many guns," is the murder rate among Japanese Americans actually lower than in Japan? And why, in England, with severe gun restriction, is the English murder rate growing, and the violent crime rate -- assaults, car thefts, hot burglaries -- now exceeding ours?

As Moore did in his entertaining film "Roger & Me," I sought out the director -- some might say "ambushed" -- in order to ask him a few questions. 

There  may soon be less of  Michael Moore.

The portly propagandist is doing a stint at the Pritikin Longevity Center & Spa in Aventura, Fla. — also known as the "fat farm for the rich." Moore is learning how to cook healthy meals and exercise and attending classes on "life re-education."

The program starts at $3,800 a week and promises enrolees they'll "learn a new approach to eating," "never have to diet again," and can lose up to 12 pounds in the first three weeks.

The facility also has "cosmetic/medical treatments, such as intense pulsed light, botox injections, and Restylane."

W. vacationed so hard in Texas he got bushed. He needed a vacation from his vacation.

The most rested president in American history headed West yesterday to get away from his Western getaway - and the mushrooming Crawford Woodstock - and spend a couple of days at the Tamarack Resort in the rural Idaho mountains.

"I'm kind of hangin' loose, as they say," he told reporters.

As The Financial Times noted, Mr. Bush is acting positively French in his love of le loafing, with 339 days at his ranch since he took office - nearly a year out of his five. Most Americans, on the other hand, take fewer vacations than anyone else in the developed world (even the Japanese), averaging only 13 to 16 days off a year.

W. didn't go alone, of course. Just as he took his beloved feather pillow on the road during his 2000 campaign, now he takes his beloved bike. An Air Force One steward tenderly unloaded W.'s $3,000 Trek Fuel mountain bike when they landed in Boise.

Gas is guzzling toward $3 a gallon. U.S. troop casualties in Iraq are at their highest levels since the invasion. As Donald Rumsfeld conceded yesterday, "The lethality, however, is up." Afghanistan's getting more dangerous, too. The defense secretary says he's raising troop levels in both places for coming elections.

So our overextended troops must prepare for more forced rotations, while the president hangs loose.

I mean, I like to exercise, but W. is psychopathic about it. He interviewed one potential Supreme Court nominee, Harvie Wilkinson III, by asking him how much he exercised. Last winter, Mr. Bush was obsessed with his love handles, telling people he was determined to get rid of seven pounds.

Shouldn't the president worry more about body armor than body fat?

In all those great Tracy/Hepburn movies more than a half-century ago, it was the snap and crackle of a romance between equals that was so exciting. Moviemakers these days seem far more interested in the soothing aura of romances between unequals.

In James Brooks's "Spanglish," Adam Sandler, as a Los Angeles chef, falls for his hot Mexican maid. The maid, who cleans up after Mr. Sandler without being able to speak English, is presented as the ideal woman. The wife, played by Téa Leoni, is repellent: a jangly, yakking, overachieving, overexercised, unfaithful, shallow she-monster who has just lost her job with a commercial design firm. Picture Faye Dunaway in "Network" if she'd had to stay home, or Glenn Close in "Fatal Attraction" without the charm.

The same attraction of unequals animated Richard Curtis's "Love Actually," a 2003 holiday hit. The witty and sophisticated British prime minister, played by Hugh Grant, falls for the chubby girl who wheels the tea and scones into his office. A businessman married to the substantial Emma Thompson falls for his sultry secretary. A writer falls for his maid, who speaks only Portuguese.

(I wonder if the trend in making maids who don't speak English heroines is related to the trend of guys who like to watch Kelly Ripa in the morning with the sound turned off?)

Art is imitating life, turning women who seek equality into selfish narcissists and objects of rejection, rather than affection.

Kelly Ripa gained an amazing 80 pounds in her recent pregnancy and was back to her svelte physique in weeks.