Instapun***K.com Archive Listing
InstaPunk.Com

Archive Listing
March 24, 2010 - March 17, 2010

Wednesday, July 08, 2009


The Prevention Fallacy

They can't wait to prevent your living.

THE SNEAKIEST GAMBIT. A rare opportunity to see some statistics on a question I've wondered about for a long time. Thanks to Mark Steyn, not surprisingly, there's this citation from a Dartmouth physician:

Life expectancy in the European Union 78.7 years; life expectancy in the United States 78.06 years; life expectancy in Albania 77.6 years; life expectancy in Libya, 76.88 years; life expectancy in Bosnia & Herzegovina, 78.17 years. Once you get on top of childhood mortality and basic hygiene, everything else is peripheral – margin-of-error territory... Even within the United States, even within the Medicare system, there are regions that offer twice as much “health care” per patient – twice as many check-ups, pills, tests, operations – for no discernible variation in outcome.

uh, that's what I thought. Mark draws the obvious conclusion:

Indeed, the fate of the late Michael Jackson may yet prove an instructive lesson in the perils of too much medical attention. But that's his choice — under our present system. You want to get tested for something you're statistically unlikely to get? That's up to you. But it's harder to discern the state's interest. A system of universal "preventive" care will create a hugely expensive, inflexible regime geared not to the illnesses you actually get but to the bureaucratic processing of waiting rooms clogged with perfectly healthy people getting annual tests for diseases they'll never get — and none of it will impact on our health, only on our tax returns.

Not only on our tax returns. On our lives as well. The preventive medicine creed as practiced by government types isn't about health. It's about control. All you need to understand about the underlying philosophy of the universal healthcare crowd is the set of arguments surrounding motorcycle helmet laws. Once, it was your head. It no longer is. Now your helmet is an economic issue to your fellow citizens. If you might damage that head so that it costs others money to treat, they have the right to make you wear a helmet. It's their head now. You're just renting it from the state.

That's what the emphasis on preventive medicine is designed to do. Enable the owners of your body to document in meticulous bureaucratic detail all the ways you're not taking care of it, so that when it does become damaged, the owners can decide whether it's worth the expense of fixing it. After they've decided not to fix the rented bodies of enough malefactors, they'll get what they really want: control of everything you do with their body -- and your meek submission to all the monitoring and regulation of your formerly private life 'required' to protect their investment.

You like boycotts? Boycott the medical profession. After the age of one, they don't have a lot to offer you that can't be handled far more cheaply and effectively by aspirin, Rolaids, and Bengay. Some of you have genuine need for their services and that's fine. But most of you don't. Stay the hell away from them. No good can come of this obsession with running to the doctor with every little ache and pain.

Life hurts. Doctors can't do a damn thing about that. And don't you forget it.





Letter Bomb


Artifact of St. Nuke, hero of The Boomer Bible and the first king
 of Punk City. Also, the lead narratist of St. Nuke & the Epissiles.

IN THE TRACKS OF THE SHUTEYE TRAIN. By unpopular demand, we're back with another punk writer story, this time from the beginning of what is called the "Mature" phase of the movement (c. 1980), when enhanced software gave punk bands carte blanche to do just about anything they wanted with words. The introduction is from the book Post-Mortem on Punk by Thomas Naughton, referenced by Lynn Wyler in this piece. Which means it's not entirely to be trusted in its assessments. However, the story is itself an excellent exegesis on the formal structure of punk writing, as well as a good demonstration of the blurred line between performance and action (some would say crime) that characterized the punk writing esthetic.

The band known as The Epissiles was originally formed as the Minutemen at the start of the punk writing movement. When St. Nuke became lead narratist, he renamed the band and pushed it to stardom in Punk City, although none of its early work survives. The demands of kingship gradually forced St. Nuke to withdraw from the band, which continued under the leadership of Zero Daze. The Epissiles piece reproduced here is possibly the first completed without the participation of St. Nuke. It is also possibly the first—or so the text claims—to be written under Release 2.0 of the NeoMax writing software. There is not much else to distinguish the work. It does typify the anti-‘Boomer’ vein of punk fiction as it developed from its beginnings in Early Punk to the more elaborate styles of High Punk, although the word ‘development’ is probably a misnomer. The pieces of High Punk were longer and more rhetorical, but they still do not add up to works of art.

Letter Bomb

0.
Ready guys? Let’s try this baby on for size, put the stylizer on overdrive, and see how great we sound.
2    One, two, three, four, GO!
3  Good day, dear readers. We are punk writers. We make stories but do not pretend to be literary.
4  Literature is dead. We are what comes after, the graffiti that defaces the tomb, the smears of filth that violate the sanctuary of suicide.
5  Does this offend you, dear reader? Perhaps you would be more comfortable with a more traditional kind of prose wrought by a finer artistic sensibility.
6  Permit us to suggest the fiction of young Andrew Travis, who writes the kind of stories you usually find in literary magazines, stories as exquisite as porcelain miniatures, in which the music of modern life is rendered pianissimo, largo, legato e sempre non tanto.
7  Andrew has recently had his first book published, a slender collection of stories described by The New York Times Book Review as ‘Exquisite, transparent prose... graceful and evocative scenes... moments of quiet brilliance connected by passages of sustained craftsmanship.”
8  If punk makes you squeamish, Six Stories may give your aesthetic palate just the placebo it needs.
9  Yes, Andrew seems to be a writer of promise and one we will be hearing more about, especially since he happens to be the protagonist of this story.
10  La di da. La di nuking da. That’s the very first output by anyone anywhere from PUNC Release 2.0, and now we can write like this anytime we want.
11  So run for cover and bolt the door: the Epissiles can do it all.

1.
We begin in New York City, where the highrise worms have bored away the guts of the Big Apple.
2  All morning, flakes of decaying fruit flesh have been falling in the streets like brown snow. Pedestrians tramp through its rank slush, which clings to their shoes and stains the city’s carpets, filling elevators, hallways and waiting rooms with the sweet and sour smell of rot.
3  In one such elevator there is a woman who seems almost to notice the stench. Her nose is wrinkled with what appears to be distaste.
4  Perhaps she will look at her shoes, see that the expensive leather is rimed with a noteworthy brown substance.
5  But no—the elevator doors open at her floor, and without a downward glance she marches into the offices of her employer, a large, successful magazine that has catered for half a century to the country’s most affluent and educated connoisseurs of sophisticated prose.
6  Our elevator passenger is, in fact, the managing editor of this magazine, and as she tracks dead apple flesh into her private office, she is preoccupied with important thoughts about the content of a fiftieth anniversary issue that will be read by millions of people.
7  It is a delicate undertaking this anniversary issue. Manhattan Magazine has done more to shape the modern short story than any other publication, living or dead, that you can think of.
8  The objective of the anniversary issue must therefore be to achieve not boldness or innovation, but quintessence, a collection of stories, poems, and articles which embody the principles of form and taste that have come to be known as the Manhattan ‘Style.’

2.
Feeling heavy, almost ponderous, under the weight of her responsibility, the managing editor reviews the list of possible contributors. She is convinced that the lead story, the one which will occupy the prized niche immediately following “Town Chat,” should be the work of a younger writer, one capable of demonstrating that Manhattan will go on for another generation, holding fiction to the same superlative standards which have dominated the literary horizon for half a century.
2  For perhaps the tenth time, she opens her copy of Six Stories. She likes the work of this Travis fellow. Yet she is concerned by one or two of the six stories. At times, in these admittedly lesser tales, things happen, there are definable events in the life of the protagonist, who is not even residing in a foreign country. One of the stories actually seems to have a structure and a plot. Cheever used to do that sort of thing, but he is dead now, and the ‘Style’ has evolved to an even higher standard under her leadership. Doesn’t Travis understand this? She feels herself tiptoeing to the edge of an emotion in the vicinity of dismay. What to do?

3.
Inside a honeysuckle-covered cottage in Maine, Andrew Travis is beginning the day’s work. He can’t wait to plunge into the fifth paragraph of his current story, a compact and delicate gem inspired by Philip Glass’s Paperweight Symphony. The main character is an elderly woman succumbing—at glacial speed—to senility.
2  But before he can start puzzling over his next perfect sentence, he must change the ribbon in his typewriter. The antique Underwood is his most prized possession. To it he attributes much of his attainment as a writer. Others in his creative writing classes at Columbia opted recklessly for computerized word processors and laughed at his gleaming mechanical dinosaur. But which of them has received the laurel of a blurb in The New York Times Book Review? And which of them is on a first name basis with the editor of Manhattan magazine?
3  Ring. Ring. Ring. Better answer it, Andrew. That should be your call from Manhattan.
4  “Hello? Oh hi, Annabella. I’m just fine, thank you. To what do I owe the honor of this call?”

4.
It is two hours later, but Andrew is still not pecking keys on the big Underwood.
2  He is too busy hugging himself with excitement. He can’t wait to tell Ronald what has happened. He has been asked to write the lead story for the Anniversary Issue. “Which anniversary issue?” he can almost hear Ronald asking him. “The Anniversary Issue.” “O-o-o-o-h!” And then there will be celebration, an intimate, thrilling dinner for two—the squab with tarragon and chervil sauce, or maybe the Capon a l’herbe... but that can wait for now. 
3  Perhaps he should even wait before telling Ronald about the assignment. There was just that one teeny-tiny hint of reservation in Annabella’s voice. Something about “not overdoing the intimations of plot.” What did she mean by that?
4  Suddenly fretful, he rereads the story he is working on. He can’t find any intimations of plot. Does that mean he’s in the clear? Or is it rather that the intimations are present in his story, in his oeuvre, for all to see, while some gap or fissure in his talent makes the fault invisible to him? Horrors. Well, he will stamp it out. Ruthlessly. Andrew Travis will have none of that in his anniversary story.
5  He executes a fevered pencil edit. He deletes, he softens, he renders even more opaque... then tosses the sheets of paper to the floor. He will start over. There will be a new story. A brief slice of perfection.
6  Time to get started, Andrew.

5.
What happens now, dear readers? Do we leave Andrew to mull and ruminate and tap at his typing machine, holding at bay all intimations of plot and structure? Do we attempt the impossible feat of making the interior world of this fey little fictioner interesting? Do we aspire, after all, to be literary?
2  Nah. Who gives a flying penwiper about the little creep? It’s the Epissiles who matter on this page. And we’re here for blood and guts, cause this ain’t no Manhattan magazine—it’s Punkfictionland. And maybe we’re not allowed to bend Annabella over her desk and give it to her from behind, but we can sure as Kain give it to Andrew instead, from the one direction he doesn’t expect, the depths of his dead little brain.

6.
Look at him. He’s been writing for days. The floor of his once neat little cottage is covered with refuse—the false starts that keep getting worse.
2  You want to see? Actually, they don’t seem so bad. Like this one:

Wormsong

    Rotting body at the morgue. All that’s left of a guy named George. Did you want to meet George? I can handle that. This is George’s hand. Shake it. Cold, ain’t it? Not much grip. Funny how you can’t tell much about him on the slab.
    He’s a body on a slab at the morgue. Clothes are in a locker, wallet’s in a brown envelope with a watch and keys and all that stuff, and George is here in his birthday suit under a sheet, all kind of purple and fish-eyed.
    You know how fishes’ eyes look when they’re dead. White and scummy kind of. Like George’s.
    So what’s up? Is George going to paradise? Don’t think so. Not today.
What’s the name of that saint? The one at the burly gates? Hard to imagine George meeting a saint looking like this. Fact is, he’s getting so he smells. No paradise. Something else.
    How about the too-young-to-die angle? After all, he can’t be more than about thirty-five. He must be too young to die.
How can it end like this, so sudden and, well, disgusting like? If there was any justice, it’d’ve been somebody else.
Somebody’s got to do something about this.
    Did you say something?
    Good idea. The brown envelope is in the drawer. Here’s the wallet. That’s pretty fancy leather.
    Okay. I’m embarrassed. Name’s not George—it’s Alfred. Alfred Cunningham. Here’s his work ID. Corporation guy. And his business card! He’s—are you listening?—Assistant Vice President, Mainframes, NeoMax Computer Corporation.
    Phew! I’m impressed.
    Here’s a picture of his wife. Not bad. Little light in the chest and heavy in the hips, but not bad.
    And two kids. A boy and a girl, maybe twelve and fourteen. They look like trashholes to me.
    And credit cards. American Express—Gold Card! Visa, Master Charge, Delta Frequent Flyer, Brooks Brothers, Exxon, Bloomingdales, Delta Crown Room... Wow! All that credit and look at him.
Wonder why he’s here. You’d think somebody would claim him... the wife, the trashholes, some vice president, somebody. They must of forgot.
    Well, Alfred’s got to get home. It’s nearly dinner time. Every second of delay, he’s missing his life.
    He’s heavy. They’re not kidding about dead weight...

3  What’s the problem? Too lowbrow, you think? Well, here’s another one:

Bedtime Story

    O come all ye faithless, joyless and triumphant.
Bring your handbags. We’re going on a trip.
Where? To the heart of the matter, where the beat of modern life originates.
    But enough of this chit chat. The elevator is waiting.
    Up, up, up.
    High speed travel to a highrise bedroom, in which a scene of passionate intensity is underway.
    Soft carpeting underfoot, soft moans under sheets.
    This must be Evelyn and Dave, consummating their brief acquaintance with a tender exchange of bodily fluids.
    If you will now consult your prose kits, you will find some background data on Evelyn and Dave.
    Evelyn makes $32,000 a year working for an advertising agency and goes to bed on a first date less than 46.2 percent of the time.
    Dave, on the other hand, makes $48,000 a year working for a management consulting firm and goes to bed on a first date more than 63.8 percent of the time.
    Tonight does not count, however, since Evelyn and Dave just met each other about three hours ago and are not in bed on a date but on an impulse.
    They are romantics, both of them, and therefore susceptible to the warmth of Friday night cocktails.
    Something about the way the stars twinkled through the sunroof of Dave’s $21,500 Japanese sports car melted Evelyn’s resolve not to let herself get talked into another one-night stand with another smooth talking sonofabitch, which she suspects Dave of being, although he has been uniformly sweet and solicitous throughout their courtship to date.

4  Is there something we’re missing? That seemed like a pretty good start to us—snappy and fast-paced. Too explicit maybe from the sex angle? No? Then what? And what’s the matter with this one?

Willing Suspension

    You’re going to believe this story if I have to come to your house and hogtie you to the couch and tear your fingernails out one by one by one by one... until you’d swear on a stack of Bibles that there really is a one-legged circus clown named Randy Joe who decided to move to Maine and write horror stories for a living.
    No, listen. LISTEN! This is going to be a great story. You see, he used to be a Navy SEAL, until...HEY! I THOUGHT I TOLD YOU HOW IT WAS GOING TO BE. DO I HAVE TO COME OVER THERE WITH MY NEEDLE-NOSE PLIERS AND MAKE YOU BELIEVE IT? DO I? That’s better.
    So Randy Joe lost his leg in the navy and then he

5  What do you suppose has gotten into Andrew? It looks like he’s lost his way a bit on this project. It’s a shame. And with the deadline getting so close... do you think he’d like a little help from a professional writer band? You do? Well, we’re delighted to help. Anything for the Anniversary Issue.

7.
CRASH-A-CLANK-A-BAM-SCRAUNCH-CLUP!
2  That’s us coming through the ceiling. Sorry about the mess.
3  Now we’re in Andrew’s living room, standing next to his poor old Underwood typewriter.
4  Andrew’s in the corner making little mewling noises and sucking his thumb. It’s possible he finds us somewhat intimidating to look at. Or is it just that he doesn’t approve of our writing instruments—the candy apple red stereotypewriter, the gold flake parallaxophone, the pink polka dotted synthesizer, the gunmetal macrophone, the ten-foot length of lime green garden hose, the oversized copper needle valve, the hickory handled icepick, and the pig iron sledgehammer. Well, he’ll get used to them.
5  Time for lesson number one, Andrew. It looks to us as if what you’re trying to write without much success is punk fiction, which is sure to be a hit with Annabella and all the highfalutin readers of Manhattan magazine. We applaud your daring.
6  But you can’t write a punk piece on an Underwood. Sorry.

8.
BANG-TINKLE-BANG-TINKLE-BANG-CLUNK.
2  That’s us writing an appropriate ending for the Underwood with our pig iron sledge.
3  Now, as soon as Andrew stops sobbing and wetting himself, we’ll move on to the matter of how you go about starting a good punk fiction piece.
4  There, that’s right, Andrew. Just take slow, deep breaths, and your aplomb will return in a trice.
5  The beginning of your piece is called the Howdy. It sets the stage, so to speak, and tells the audience who’s in charge, and to whom they will owe the pleasure of their fiction experience. We prefer to do ours on the macrophone. Like so:

    Time has run out on you, dear boomer. You’ve been succored into the blindest of dark alleys.
    There is no mercy here, no friendly hand to guide you, no reassuring voice to still your dread.
    Here you are only prey, and here there is no safety in numbers.
Straight razors wait at every corner to cut your throat. Holes in the pavement plunge to the abyss.
    The garbage cans are full of murdered babies, and the cats that gnaw on their heads have the rotten breath of art and radioactive eyes that suck up light and give you cancer in the dark.
    There is no turning back. The entrance has been sealed by the heap of dishonored corpses you trampled coming in.
    The only way out is forward, but at the end of the alley a wall blocks the exit. It is a high, long, smooth, hard wall disfigured by graffiti.
    In short, dear boomer, you are trapped. Trapped and soon to be hoist by punk petard.
    What can you, what in the name of all you might once conceivably have held sacred, is there for you to do?
    Read the writing on the wall, one last epissile from us to you.

6  You see, Andrew? You don’t ask for the suspension of disbelief. You just suspend it. Notice how we no longer seem to be in your living room, but in a long dark alley instead? Do you feel that sense of being trapped, dear Andrew? Good. Then the Howdy is complete.
7  Please stop sniveling, Andrew. We’re only here to help.

9.
Next comes the launch of the story proper. If you want, you can introduce characters. That’s what the stereotypewriter is for. But it’s not absolutely necessary to have the characters enter right away. Everyone will know who they are before you even mention them.
2  Can you guess who the main characters are going to be in this story, Andrew? We bet you can. So that means we have some room to begin the action more obliquely. Mayhap with a nifty solo on the parallaxophone. Comme ci. That’s French, isn’t it, Andrew?

    City lights. The terrorist stands at the center, watching.
    Highways bind the city in place, chains of light tying knots to hold the rhythms in, bend them back inside, repeat the captive pattern.
    Clocks and neon signs and skyscraping lanterns blinking their slow coded translations of continuum, the string of nights that links all lives together.
    And at the center, the terrorist. In love with light, he carries his avowal across the rooftops, his sneakered feet hurrying toward the rendezvous.
    The face of a terrorist may be like any other face. Eyed, eared, nosed, and mouthed, it hungers for sensation and relays the headlines of current events to the brain, which forms its committees of response.
    The face is unimportant, even the face of a terrorist The brain is all. Inside its corridors and anterooms, news is discussed in tones of alarm. The war plans, coiled and waiting, lie locked in the vault below. In the star chamber the conferees are at odds: the situation is grave, voices are raised, and the only consensus is of catastrophe.
    Driven by catastrophe, the terrorist moves out across the city, mulling destinations, declarations, devastations. He has been everywhere already and a map of the city has grown across the back wall of his mind, behind the lenses of his two-way eyes.
    On the map and in the city he has been everywhere. But not always as a terrorist.
    Once, first, as an observer only, he went out to hear the heartcries, city whispers, people’s lives.

3  Movement, Andrew, that’s the key. Get it going, keep it going, promise death and keep the promise. Have you figured out how we’re going to keep our promise, Andrew?
4  That’s right! With more action!

    He heard the crying, and the moaning, and the praying, and the screaming,
    Until his ears grew full of empty noise,
    And his heart turned black with anger.
    Thus was the terrorist born,
    An embryo formed in the outer world of desperate prisoners’ cries,
    Then squeezed full-grown through sound canals,
    Into the ready room of mind.
    He speaks: “There is no voice of light in all the din, and the power lords are telling lies, with lights for sale that beam the dark to every church and home.
    It’s time to quench the light that lies,
    And punish the thieving power lords.”

5  We’re getting excited, Andrew. We’re in the city, and we’re closing in. Your story’s going to be great.
6  But now we change the gears again, and get ready for the Splat.

10.
The Splat? Well, that’s where we keep our promise to the reader. The dear reader.
2  Thus:

    Once upon a time there was a power lord named Annabella,
Who held in her hands a broken light that scattered lines of darkness everywhere.
    She was proud of the light and the dark it shed, for she thought the darkness was light.
    That’s why the Epissiles paid her a visit,
    In her office in midtown Manhattan.

3  Why are you squirming like that, Andrew? Hold still. This will only hurt for a second.

    "Who are you?" cried Annabella. "Why are you here, and what do you want?"
    "We’re here to kill you," the Epissiles said, "for crimes against the light."
    "What the hell are you talking about?" Annabella was irate. No one talks to managing editors like that.
    "This," said the Epissiles and pulled from a bag the head of a promising young writer.
    "Aaaaaaaaaaaaaaahhhhhhhhhhhh!" screamed Annabella.
    "Wait," said the Epissiles. "We want to show you what’s inside this head you prized so much."
    And as Annabella stood glazed in shock, the Epissiles attached their ten foot length of lime green garden hose to the oversized copper needle valve they’d jammed inside Andrew’s icepick-penetrated skull, and then they sprayed one last Epissile, in bright red blood, on the wall of Manhattan style:

From the Punks to their Unlit Pals:

    Time has run out on you, dear authors. You’ve written yourselves into the blindest of dark alleys.
    There is no mercy here, no friendly hand to guide you, no reassuring voice to still your dread.
    Here you are only random idiosyncratics, and here there is no meaning or salvation.
    The children of your unbelief are dying to catch you alone.     They needed you to dream some dreams, but you painted walls instead. When they catch you, and they will, they’ll give you cancer in the dark.
    Literature is dead. That’s why your garbage reeks of murdered babies, and why the stench of art is even worse, and why your lives are worthless wastes of the ink and paper you have spoiled.
    There is no turning back. The entrance has been sealed by you.
    The only way out is forward, but you threw away your map, your compass, and all the stars that show the way.
    You’re extinct and don’t know it. Your writing’s a joke, and the future will laugh you to hell.
    One more thing: KA-B-O-O-O-O-M!
    And SPLAT goes Annabella.

4  Is that what you had in mind for the anniversary issue, Andrew?
5  Andrew?
6  Andrew?
7  Happy Anniversary.

Shammadamma.





YouTube Wednesday:

Once Upon a Time...

She's right. We hold a grudge for a long, loooong time.
Even though we're mostly taller than Charles Bronson


GUNFIGHTS ARE KEWL
. Since we're in the mode of honoring our commenters -- the best in the blogosphere -- I couldn't resist this. Maggie said:

Whenever I come to this blog I get the incredible urge to watch "Mothman Prophecies" or "Once Upon A Time In The West" ... SOMETIMES "White Chicks" ... but not usually. MAYBE "Richie Rich" ... nahhh, my mistake. Just go with the first two to be sure.

Have to admit it's an honor to be associated with Once Upon a Time in the West. Read all the user comments at IMDB.com because we're only going to reproduce one:

Fonda's favorite, and mine too

There are few movies that can combine great directing, acting, music, cinematography, and writing into one movie, but this one does. There are no weak points. Every scene is a piece of art. I know of no other film that affects the senses as this one. Henry Fonda said this was his favorite film and role. It's easy to see why. He created 1 of the great "bad guy" roles in history. In a side note, Leone wanted to put brown contacts in Fonda's eyes ("who ever saw a villain with blue eyes", Leone said), but Fonda wouldn't have it, and the effect is magic in the famous Leone close-ups. Bronson, Cardinale, and Robards are equally powerful, all have great lines and the camera loves them. Speaking of cameras, the visuals are stunning. There is nothing fancy about this movie. Raw power is what you see and feel. Simply the best western if not film ever made.

We hadn't actually seen the Mothman Prophecies, but a look at the trailer convinced us that it's pretty much like a normal day at the office for Instapunk.


Okay, So we're frequently confused. Sooorry.

The White Chicks thing was harder to figure until we came across this appreciation at IMDB.com:

This movie makes fun of everyone-- black, white, rich, poor, dorks, cool people... no one is safe.

Got it.


And, yeah, it looks exactly like this around here every day. Is that a problem?

Don't get the Richie Rich thing, though. I'm turning 57 in two days -- skipping 56 for religious reasons -- and I haven't looked like Macauley Culkin for, well, half a century. I don't look like Charles Bronson, either. But I'm taller. And more vindictive.




Tuesday, July 07, 2009


An InstaPunk Public Service Utility


NOBODY CAN YELL CONTINUOUSLY. I've always been fascinated by the boiling frog phenomenon that seems to describe the reaction of otherwise normal people when they're caught in the midst of a time of cataclysmic political retrogression. While The Terror was rounding up counterrevolutionaries in France, while Stalin was rounding up counterrevolutionaries in Russia, while Hitler was rounding up Jews in the Reich.... Ordinary folks must have known at some level that the bonds of civilization were dissolving, but they still had to go to work everyday, and matters of shocking moment somehow became the stuff of petty gossip -- and dare I say 'punditry' -- rather than a shrieking call to action. When the unthinkable becomes routine, what becomes of the person whose whole soul is screaming in outrage? My guess is that the constant sight of what his neighbors and fellow countrymen simply will not see either gradually inures him to all varieties of disaster OR he becomes convinced that he himself has lost his mind.

That's how I've come to regard the Obama administration. The unthinkable is now routine. Every new day brings us a new outrage against the constitution, the separation of powers, national security, the free enterprise system, and the 200-plus years of individual liberty and personal responsibility that made this the greatest, freest, and most prosperous nation on earth. Even the people who are nominally on our side are sitting placidly in the simmering media pot on the stove, acting and talking as if major crimes against our heritage and values were mere political maneuvers to be parsed like chess gambits or poker hands.


Yes, you're being slowly boiled to death.

It's not true that all this is politics as usual. The hard thing to remember. Our country is being hijacked and dismantled. If you know that in your heart of hearts, you have NOT lost your mind. Things CAN go way south in a hell of a hurry, irretrievably so. But no one can be hysterically overwrought all the time. It's too exhausting. What's important is that no matter how everyone else is coping, you retain some access to the underlying reality, so that when all around you are acting deaf, dumb, and blind to the unfolding ruination, you have somewhere to go.

That's what this page is. When that Crisis Moment hits, just look up the word Emergency in the InstaPunk search function and press the damn button up top. What you find will remind you of the stark reality everyone but you insists on forgetting today.

Persevere, my friends. You are not alone. Even when it feels like you are.
 





Shammadamma

Screaming. Screaming. Screaming.

HER OBSESSION. The punk piece that began it all. They wrote like bands, on computers, with custom input devices that fed into a central processor which made a narrative of it all. In the case of the Shuteye Train, it was said that they were merely documenting crimes already committed -- a kind of computer-compiled confession. Nobody knows what really happened. Just that South Street in Philadelphia suddenly became a place to be feared in 1980 or thereabouts. The moment the worm turned. Even the Pagans stopped going there. Ancient history with no continuing relevance? Sure. Did they exist? We're kind of sort of betting they did. What is fiction, after all, but writing that doesn't claim to be history, only truth.



0.
Hear we come, the Shuteye Train, ranting and writing and all for you.
2  Shammadamma.

1.
We knew a guy.
2  He was like you, a regular type guy, and we knew him since like the time he first got his head together and started doing his own thing.
3  Back then he was in college in the days when coke was like this sugary ripoff made by this giant corporate fascist oppressor.
4  He thought his father was a pig. So was his mother. In fact she threw this like fit when Steve stayed over Christmas vacation in his own room with his girlfriend Marjorie.
5  His name was Steve.
6  He started college as a political science major but in sophomore year he switched to black studies, he was into civil rites and the Revolution and had these ideals and everything.
7  Shammadamma. We’re the Shuteye Train, coming at you.

2.
Steve learned a lot in black studies.
2  Like he learned history was all lies and the US was like this really corrupt evil totalitarian state with these policies of genocide in Southeast Asia and the inner cities.
3  Steve really freaked when he like found out what was going down, so his roommate got he and Marjorie into the party and they all worked night and day for the Revolution.
4    Shammadamma.

3.
One night Steve dropped some acid and Marjorie and him were talking about the Revolution until Steve got off and Marjorie was saying like how everything had to be destroyed, the government and everything, before social justice could, you know, happen.
2  And Steve started having these really heavy thoughts about what all Marjorie was saying just as he started to get off.
3  There was this Doors album on and he started getting like really tuned in to the heaviness of the Revolution and the heaviness of the music all at the same time and pretty soon it was like he could really see the music coming right out of the speakers and the music like was the Revolution just starting to happen and it was beautiful.
4  When he concentrated Steve could stretch his arms right across the room and feel the music wrap around his fingers and crawl all over his body, like the Revolution was pulling him in and making him a part of it and all.
5  It was like really blowing his mind and then it pulled him right out of the room and down into the street and into this latenight store where it like told him to get some cans of spraypaint.
6  Marjorie went with him and she couldn’t hear the music but she was getting this like contact high and she could see the way the Doors were, you know, swirling all around Steve, making him knock things off the shelf, so she got into it herself and pushed over this giant cardboard TV announcer who was advertising some kind of detergent on the shelf next to him.
7  The store manager was this real pig and he calls the cops, so the Doors music like pulled them out of the store and told Steve to spraypaint like all the college walls that didn’t have ivy on them.
8  They spraypainted all the slogans they could think of and all the ones the Doors told Steve to paint and later Steve’s old man wouldn’t go bail and he had to write his term paper on ‘Modern Slavery’ in jail, which was really far out and got an A-minus.
9  Shammadamma, we’re the Shuteye Train, punk writer band from the land of Kain.

4.
So Steve and Marjorie went to Woodstock nation and it was really beautiful, you know?
2  They borrowed this old van and drove to Woodstock and got stuck in a field but it didn’t matter, people gave them dope and they drank wine and got off on the music, it was like really incredible because there was this love all around and Steve made it with this chick from Skidmore and Marjorie thought the whole thing was beautiful and she took off all her clothes and went wading and didn’t get embarrassed at all like she usually was about how she was a little overweight, and she even made it later with this enormous ugly fat guy.
3  But he had a beautiful soul and was into Country Joe and the Fish like you wouldn’t believe.
4  Steve didn’t even mind, he had dropped some really wild mescaline and it was like he was this fat guy and he could even feel the tattoo of an eagle this guy had on his arm which flapped its wings to the music of Country Joe.
5  It rained but they didn’t care and later they couldn’t get the van unstuck but they didn’t care about that either, so they hitched a ride back to Boston, only they wound up not going to Boston right off but staying for a while with these really beautiful people who had this farm in New Hampshire.
6  Even the ducks got stoned. Shammadamma.

5.
But then there was like Altamont and Kent State and Steve got into graduate school with his deferment and Marjorie got knocked up.
2  Steve’s old man had already cut him off except for tuition, so Marjorie had to split for Philadelphia and have the kid at her sister’s house.
3  She named it Peaceflower.
4  And then Steve and her like started to grow apart because Marjorie was kind of, you know, standing still, and couldn’t see how the Revolution had bummed out, and how if you wanted to reform the system you had to do it from like inside, with your caring and ideals and everything.
5  There was this really bad scene the time Marjorie came up from Philadelphia to visit, and like her sister was getting ready to throw her out in the street if she didn’t get a job, and Steve couldn’t make her see like how his father had finally decided to pay Steve’s way through law school, which Steve had just gotten into, only he wouldn’t if Steve turned up with this kid, which how could he be sure was, you know, really his?
6  They were in this nice restaurant in Boston with white tablecloths and all, and the waiter had like sneered when Marjorie ordered strawberry wine, and she wouldn’t eat the ratatouille because she got so uptight.
7  She really freaked when Steve let slip about the kid and, you know, whose it was and all, and she started to cry and said how she really loved Steve in the deepest possible way and there was only ever that fat guy at Woodstock, which was different and wasn’t her idea anyway.
8  But how could Steve be, you know, sure, and anyway there was law school and he was only going so he could reform the system from within like they’d talked about, and couldn’t she see how it was, but Marjorie only cried into her ratatouille and left the next day.
9  Shammadamma, the Shuteye Train, burning through the boomer brain.

6.
Steve’s mom and dad came to his law school graduation.
2  He introduced them to Sara. She was president of the Women’s Law Alliance and Steve’s current female companion.
3  They all went out to dinner and Sara and Steve’s folks didn’t hit it off very well.
4  Sara asked Steve’s dad how many women had been in his class at medical school and got into a huff when Steve’s dad said not many, they’d had to chase nurses instead.
5  Then Sara asked Steve’s mom how she could stand not having been allowed to accomplish anything with her life.
6  Shammadamma.
7  Steve’s mom said you can talk to me that way when you’ve raised three sons and made a good home for your family like I have.
8  Sara sniffed and ate a cracker, and later when he was alone with his parents Steve explained how hard it was for women who wanted careers in a chauvinist society and how you had to understand if they seemed a little aggressive sometimes.
9  They forgave Sara and him the next day when he stood there in his robes and got his law degree, and told him how proud they were that he had made the law review and gotten such a good job in Philadelphia.
10  Shammadamma, the Shuteye Train, making tracks and planning pain.

7.
Steve worked real hard for the firm, long days and nights of endless pressure and toil.
2  He wondered for a long time how he stood it and what good was an expensive car and an apartment in Society Hill if you never got to enjoy them, but after he broke up with Sara, who was, after all, far too militant and humorless to be a good companion for Steve, he found out that Philadelphia was an entertaining city.
3  He read up on astrology and took up racketball and learned to disco, and the women of Philadelphia loved him.
4  But he played around only in moderation and kept his nose pretty firmly to the grindstone, and it was no surprise when he got invited to join an exclusive golf club that Elizabeth’s father was a big wheel in.
5  On the sixteenth green one Sunday not long after that, he met some of the senior partners of the firm and a few months later he was promoted to associate partner, which made him laugh a little to himself because he felt like some kind of impostor, because he was really like the same guy he had always been, only maybe more laid back and not quite so idealistic, and wouldn’t it be funny if like everyone else was really an impostor too, like walking around disguised in three-piece suits and expensive golf clubs?
6  Shammadamma.

8.
One day soon after Steve had finished his first big case, Elizabeth said maybe it was time they got married, shammadamma, and Steve had this big decision to make.
2  He thought and thought, and thought finally that maybe a father-in-law and a wife might be the thing to do, the next step to take.
3  So they set a date in June and Elizabeth moved out of the apartment for awhile to keep the older friends and relatives from getting upset, and Steve played golf with Elizabeth’s father, and Elizabeth and her mother shopped like mad, and engraved invitations went out in the mail and brought back hundreds of wedding presents and then hundreds of wedding guests, who filled the ivy-covered church so that Elizabeth and Steve could get properly married and live happily ever after.

9.
So they stood at the altar and the priest got ready to say the words and behind them in the church all their friends were smiling and looking forward to the reception, and Steve thought how everything was going to work out just right, and life was really okay, you know?
2  And the organist finished the processional and then the doors of the church swung open with a tremendous crash.
3  Naturally Steve turned around to look, because who on earth could be coming in so late?

10.
Shammadamma, the Shuteye Train.
2    We write with guns.

11.
And some of the women screamed, and Steve couldn’t believe what was happening, like who were these people and what did they want?
2  Shammadamma, pullatrigga. Shammadamma, shootabooma.

12.
And Steve tried to, you know, get away when he saw what was coming down, tried to run for his life, but it was way too late and where was there for him to go anyway?
2  Shammadamma, BLAMMADAMMA. BLAMMADAMMA BLAMMADAMMA BLAMMADAMMA BLAMMADAMMA.

13.
We knew a guy, a regular type guy, but he died on his wedding day.
2    Dammashamma.

That last line is kind of an inversion. What they really meant was 'Shammadamma.'

Just so you Millennial Kids know what we're talking about here.





Taylor Lowers the Boom

They kill you with their venom. (Up to the minute science.) Just not right away.

IT WAS JUST A BUTTON. JEEZ.. We're inordinately proud of our commenters here. (Yes, Penny, you'll be here someday too. Give us a graphic idea to work with...) Other sites worry about screening out disgusting language and threats. We worry only about getting outshone by our readers. Which is happening a lot lately. Today, it's Taylor, who apparently didn't like our 'Emergency Button.' Here's what he had to say.

The boiled frog comparison is good as far as it goes, but there's a difference from our current predicament: The frog gets boiled slowly because the frog doesn't comprehend what's happening.

For us on the other hand, at some level many if not most people in this country know exactly what is being done to them. They don't do anything about it because they just can't comprehend how this state of affairs came to pass, and they aren't sure what if anything they can do.

The societal mesmerization that's going on as Hope-a-Dope and the donks do to this country what that Egyptian Airlines co-pilot did a few years ago -- purposefully point the plane's nose straight down into the drink and accelerate -- comes from this human characteristic of shock and disbelief ("The pilot's not supposed to do that, is he?") overcoming the survival instinct.

When confronted by something seemingly too incredible to be "real," the human mind tends to either lock up or to look for escape via rationalizations.

Denial: "Brain lock" is why two-thirds to three quarters of American soldiers and marines who experienced Japanese "banzai" charges or Chinese "human wave" attacks never fired their weapons. They just stared disbelievingly at the mass of humanity rushing at them. These were men who had been trained to fight, and who knew when they went to the front line that an encounter with the enemy was at least possible if not probable; yet they still froze when the time came.

What does that say for the American People today, the vast majority of whom have undergone no mental preparation for what's coming?

Rationalization: A "This isn't happening" reaction occurs when, for example, an airport security screener on 9/11 encounters an Arab foreigner with no bags to check, a one-way ticket and whose face looks like pathological hatred incarnate: everything about the guy screams "hijacker," but the screener's sense of disbelief allows his feel-good politically correct indoctrination to take over.

Bottom line, Hope-a-Dope and the donks are like a Komodo Dragon: if it bites you, you don't die right away. Rather, it lets you run around pumping the venom through your system while it follows and waits for the effects to kick in. When you collapse onto the ground, it moves in to polish you off.

Similarly, we haven't yet felt the full effects of the poison that the donks have injected into this country since last November, so it's still easy to fall into a sense of disbelief, denial and false hope.

By the time we begin to feel the symptoms, it'll be too late.

Too late to save the Republic. The venom is numbing us even as I write this, but most people are either too mesmerized or too ensconced in denial to fight it.

What I am more concerned with is what will rise from the ashes.

uh, me too. What he said.

[I hate to spoil Taylor's malignant mood, but 30-some years ago I met a Korean who was a reporter at the Boston Herald Tribune. He'd been an intelligence officer for the South Korean army in that war. He described interrogation tactics he'd personally conducted -- without the least regret -- having to do with water and the bitterly cold Korean winters... things about water turning to ice, human noses, and not breathing, and watching men die and such... Forget that. He was a cold cold man. But he told me that what frightened the Koreans about the United States, truly and utterly terrified them, north and south alike, was the marine determination to leave no man behind. "We could not understand that," he told me over a game of pool in otherwise civilized surroundings. "It did not make sense to us. It filled us with fear. We could not defeat that." He didn't defeat it. He became an American citizen. And I kicked his ass at 8-ball..]

UPDATE. So here comes Billy Oblivion, another veteran commenter. Weighing in on the same subject, responding to Taylor:

I have never learned to throw the first punch.

Perhaps the more you know the more you get scared.

""

New Model Army, "Believe It"

I've spent a good bit of the last 25 years involved in the study of violence. I'm not very good at it compared to the professionals--the Special Ops types, MMA fighters etc. but I think I have at least an intellectual understanding.

Which is the problem.

To a large degree violence--at least effective violence--is almost the antithesis of violence (from one perspective, from another a different argument is made).

To be intellectual is to pause in thought, to consider actions and their consequences.

You're sitting in a bar having a quiet drink. Jack and Coke, Jack on the rocks, or just Jack in a glass. A pretty girl sits down next to you. It's movement, and perfume. You glance over. Her companion notices and takes offense. (Cliche' yes, but I'm taking this somewhere). He starts down the road to fisticuffs; at what point do you stop responding like a civilized man? At what point do you grab that fucking long neck the guy next to you just finished and brain the meathead with it?

You don't. You wait for him to move first, because you hung up the leather and the Doc Martens a decade ago and you've got a job to get to Monday morning and a mortage or at least a car payment and a wife and if you show up with stitches and a black eye and explain that you've got to go to court for negligent homicide you're going to miss a few car payments and it'll get repo'd and there goes that credit rating you spent the better part of a decade repairing after that expensive private college you paid for mostly out of your own pocket with grants and loans and a tour in the Marine Corps.

So smile and apologize for looking at his lady, and you hope that this mollifies him and you finish your drink and you move on.

There are two types of fights. Duels, and Ambushes.

Duels are two dandies, or two drunks slugging it out for honor. Both know it's coming, and both know when. No surprises, no positional advantage, no maneuver warfare. This is pure strength and stamina and endurance and pain tolerance. The harder, faster, stronger guy wins, unless the other guy gets lucky.

No one with any sense gets in a duel. No one. Ever. Unless it really is about something that you'd rather die than break the rules over.

Because cheating is for sports and card games. There is no cheating in a real fight (i.e., outside the ring), there is only winning and dying. And court, so don't cheat too much.

Amubushes. Most fights are ambushes and you ALWAYS want to be the ambushers. You set the claymores, you position your machine guns and your supporting artillery.

Even if it's just a buddy with a pool cue.

But the problem still is pulling the trigger. Intellectuals think; we think of ripples spreading out from the rock we're about to hit this guy in the back of the head with.

A meth head doesn't think, she swings. Wildly, with crazy strength and hepatitis and possibly AIDs and those wicked fucking fingernails that haven't been cut in a dog's age, but are torn and ragged.

You knew it was coming, but you never saw the place where the Reasonable Man the Prosecution was going to call as a witness would have struck first, so you're behind the power curve as she's clawing your f'ing eyes out.

So you sit there in your recliner with a glass of Makers Mark in hand and contemplate that fine looking woman in the harbor of the million story city. A bit green with age, things ain't like they were when she started her vigil.

And you fear for the country that she is welcoming people to. You fear in your gut, you fear in your head because you can see those ripples and you've read history and you've read psychology and sociology and etc.

And you try to explain to people that we need to stop this we need to stop spending our children's and grandchildren's money.

We need to stop supporting bad farming practices. We need to stop supporting bad breeding practices. Bad schooling, bad politics.

We need to stand up and be responsible, we need to pay our own way, we need to help the less fortunate, but not by buying them a concrete block shack at a thousand dollars a brick.

But they call you a fear monger as they complain about the snail darter and global warming and drink their shade grown coffee and talk about how capitalism needs the firm hand of government over the invisible hand of Smith.

And just *when* do you pull that trigger? Just when do you start the ambush?

Are YOU willing to give up your house, and your car, and your credit rating?

And how do you unscrew a pregnant lady anyway?

Rome wasn't burned in a day, but Pompeii was.

Entropy means lots of things. What it mostly tells us is that if you don't keep adding energy to a system it will decay.

The only people adding energy to our system are the people who think the system should be able to give back more than you put in.

And of course, the only people who are willing to muster serious opposition are those like Limbaugh, Hannity and Gingrinch.. And Palin, and Reagan, who are outliers. At least Reagan was. Palin, we'll see.

But the problem is what to do.

Duels are stupid, but ambushes, well you'd BETTER hit so damn hard and so damn fast and so damn accurate that you don't lose.

Last November 80 Marines in Afghanistan got ambushed by about 250 Taliban. Odds were over 3 to 1. On the Taliban's home turf. The Ts were well supplied--this wasn't a hit and run, they were prepared and going for a propaganda victory.

In Marine terms this was a "fair fight". Barely.

Once they extracted their peeps from the kill zone, the marines, as they are wont to do, aggressed into the ambush and proceeded to kill 1/5th of their opposition WITHOUT A SINGLE MARINE FATALITY.

One Marine--the Designated Hitter for the unit--fired his rifle IIRC 22 times. He got 22 hits.

So even ambushes--when you're well prepared and have what appear to be overwhelming odds--don't always work. Especially when the other side has some pipe hitting mother fuckers.

Which is to say that you have to be willing to hit hard, and hit first, but you gotta watch out for the ripples, but if you're watching the ripples you know too much.

How do you get the killer instinct and the intellectual understanding without becoming a sociopath?

Which may sort of explain our leaders and our predicament.

All right. I get it. You don't have to hit the button. You can ventilate here. InstaPunk is interested in what you have to say.

UPDATE 2. This one from Geojitsu, who I'm reliably informed is a marine of 'seasoned' age:

IP’s “button” tactic isn’t fooling me. It’s simply his way of looking for a few good men–and I think he found a pair in Taylor and Billy Oblivion.

To Taylor, two quibbles about your excellent post. First, you assert that as the result of brain lock, “two-thirds to three quarters of American soldiers and marines who experienced Japanese banzai charges or Chinese human wave attacks never fired their weapons.” There are a number of ways to attack that position, but I’ll go with six: Guadalcanal, Iwo Jima, Okinawa, Peleliu, Saipan, and Tarawa. None of these hell holes would have been taken if 75% of the Marines in the rifle platoons had frozen under fire. No way. I refer you to what I believe is the finest battle memoir ever written. “With the Old Breed: At Peleliu and Okinawa” by E. B. Sledge.

Second, you say “most people in this country know exactly what is being done to them.” I say [about] half know what is being done to them. And that would be the people who voted AGAINST putting fascist thugs into the White House and Congress.

The problem is not cowardice, it’s ignorance. Decades of collectivist thought has reached critical mass, and we are now reaping the whirlwind.

And finally, to Billy’s question “How do you get the killer instinct and the intellectual understanding without becoming a sociopath?” I'd say BRASS, the acronym every Marine recruit learns before ever hitting the rifle range. “Breath-Relax-Aim-Slack-Squeeze.”

Thank you, gentlemen. Keep'em coming.




Monday, July 06, 2009


Playing the Palin Game

Churchill had his Wilderness Years. So should she.

UPDATE. As everyone here should know, I like Sarah Palin, but I'm dismayed by the amount of fire and brimstone that's surging through the rightosphere in the aftermath of her very odd announcement. You can get a snapshot of said F&B at HotAir, in a 'Green Room' post that quotes extensively from Ace of Spades. Just a snippet of Ace's tirade:

...I do think I am taking off the week. You guys only seem to want to talk about Sarah Palin and furthermore you only want to hear the same thing — she’s running, this is a great move, she’s now perfectly poised for the race, etc.

It’s nonsense. And I hardly need to blog about it, because you all seem to know the words to the song. So you don’t need me as part of the chorus. You can sing the same words well enough without me.

I am really tired of this relentless nonsense and occasional nastiness whenever someone is believed to have departed from the conservativey correct line.

If people really are going this nuts about it, they need to stop. Nobody really knows anything, so everyone's speculating. Why is that the case? Because she hasn't explained anything. Which is hardly a sound foundation on which to base a national campaign for the presidency in the next election. Which leads me to conclude that if she's really running, she's a fool and should give up her plans at once. And if she's not running, for either the presidency or the senate, all we can do is wait and see what she has in mind.

But I can tell you what I hope she has in mind. I hope she stays away from public office at least through 2012. I hope she spends her time in the interim reading books and otherwise educating herself about matters of public policy she still knows little about beyond Alaska. She also has an opportunity to accept speaking engagements and earn enough money to put her family on a sound financial footing. If she wishes to remain somewhat in the public eye, she can also ally herself with the Tea Party movement and its trans-party calls for reduced spending, reduced taxes, and reduced government interference in our lives. Those folks don't seem to like officials presently serving in office, bless their hearts. And Palin can turn a desultory rally of 500 into a fired-up crowd of 5,000.

If she takes this tack, she also won't waste much of her time campaigning for professional politicians in order to win official Republican backing she is unlikely to get until they come hat in hand to her, years down the road.

Quitting her elected responsibilities before her term was complete (regardless of how valid the private and personal reasons for it) makes her an anti-establishment figure for a long time to come. Given enough time, she could work that to her advantage. But not in the short term. That's why the professional pundits are busily writing her off. A traditional political career of dues-paying followed by big-party endorsement is out of the question now. Any political career still available to her will have to be nontraditional, unique, and transformational -- of her in fact as well as in the media image of her. That will not happen in three years. If it even seems to, it's a recipe for disaster. She'll lose. And if she doesn't, she won't be ready.

She's young. That's a huge advantage. Now she must learn to be patient and learn period.

If you like her too, quit scolding those who are being critical now. To a significant extent, they are right. If they're writing her off altogether, only Palin can prove them wrong. And she'll need a lot more than two or three years to do that. Fortunately, she has more than two or three years. She has twenty or thirty.

My two cents.






Just a Hunch


A BRIEF SENTENCE. Now, we're waiting. One celebrity death every day or so. Today it's McNamara. This won't be a long post. Just a grim prediction. When people start to die in increased numbers, it means something big is about to happen. Something big and bad. Something a lot of people don't want to be a part of. Meaning they'd rather be dead. Something about Jung's Collective Unconscious*  I just hope I'm not one of them. Obama is going to rain down hell on all of us. Some of us don't want to wait for it. Some of us are willing to fight to survive it. I hope I'm one of the latter. Which are you?

*My creation story, the one I believe, lies in the field of potentialities between Hawking's possibly nonexistent (because always -- Zeno's Arrow-like -- infinitely approaching the unreachable limit) Big Bang and Roger Penrose's quantum mind. There is a space in that conceptual interval which leaves room for all presently conceived possibilities and innumerable ones we can't conceive of. It may allow for all kinds of relationships that science cannot presently comprehend, including a universe in which ideas, art, poetry, symbols and allegories -- and Jung's synchronicity -- interact seamlessly with the physics we keep trying to reduce to (mere) math. In this context, there might be a place for humanity's many metaphorical creation myths and its curiously parallel religious convictions to be something more than fairy tales, fallacies, jokes, proofs of mankind's talent for self-delusion, and catalysts for your contempt. The continuously unfolding and infinitely reinterpretable story of Christ's sacrifice on the cross may -- may, I say -- actually be of a piece with the universe itself. These are conceptions which have the potential to expand minds and deepen the most minute aspects of human experience -- without consigning us all to fanaticism or irrational denial.


Death is stalking us. Thank you, Obama.




Thursday, July 02, 2009


The Blinking Cursor Effect

Obama's response to the Iran uprisings, the Honduran crisis, the Russian
invasion of Georgia, North Korean saber rattling, and for that matter
 the Reverend Jeremiah Wright situation. Mystery computer indeed.


THE FUTURE COMETH. This isn't an ideological post. Never mind that I almost always disagree with Obama's policies and positions. This time I'm talking about something more basic: his ability to respond to surprising and changing circumstances. I think he is seriously deficient in this vital leadership attribute.

Great executives, great leaders of the military and of matters of state, tend to be men who excel at making decisions in the absence of complete information. They have a gut instinct for judging the odds and placing their bets when all around them are uncertain, conflicted, or in disagreement with one another. It's not that they're shallow thinkers per se. It's that they automatically perceive the dangers of too much deep thinking when situations are in danger of tipping into chaos or disaster. They're prepared to be wrong. It's not that they're necessarily rash, either. Rather, they recognize those times when delay is more perilous and costly than a calculated risk that goes awry. Because they'll be on the job to deal with those consequences too.

Consider, for example, that very few great generals are remembered as intellectual giants, able to comprehend all the complications of all the variables in play at a given moment in time. I'm sure military historians know of more, but I can think of only two: Napoleon and MacArthur. Interestingly, both of them experienced dramatic instances of what I'm calling "the blinking cursor" phenomenon, when for no apparent reason they both shut down completely for critical hours at the height of a military emergency. Napoleon sat down on a log at Waterloo and did nothing for hours while the tide of battle turned irretrievably against him, though it's possible he could have saved the day if he had acted. MacArthur had a similar shutdown for eight hours after Pearl Harbor, issuing no orders to protect the Clark Field air resources whose subsequent destruction was probably as damaging as the ships lost at Pearl. According to eyewitnesses, he was seemingly paralyzed out of action during this interval. Like Bonaparte, he was betrayed by an all-encompassing intellect that suddenly couldn't wrap itself around the enormity of the variables in motion.

For Napoleon and MacArthur, of course, these were anomalies. For Obama it has become an all too familiar pattern. When bumptious reality conflicts with his ordered conception of reality, he becomes suddenly inarticulate, repetitive, almost stuck. The blinking cursor effect to a fare thee well.  It seems to happen to him on matters both great and small. An unexpected question invariably releases the torrent of "uhs" with which we're all so familiar. Initially, like a lot of you probably, I chalked that up to the fact that he wasn't quite as good an extemporaneous speaker as he was an orator-cum-teleprompter. Even his friends noticed.



I hoped it wasn't the case, but I did remember that we had identified this phenomenon as serious in Shuteye Nation's Y2K AmerianGlossary, half a decade at least before Obama rose to prominence. The Glossary defined it thus:

Uh. 1) You know. 2) An interesting but incorrect alternate definition is contained in the following entry penned by the Nutz Station Journal columnist known as The Gadfly:
The blinking cursor of human speech, often a precursor of screen lockup and the imminent need to reboot.
In other words, "uh" is not just a verbal tic; it's an indication of a state of mind. Which means we don't have to hear it every time to know that it's present. Like all those "Present" votes in the Illinois legislature. And the indeterminate official statements that have clarified absolutely nothing for the American people or the world in the early stages of the Russian-Georgia Crisis, the Iran Crisis, the North Korean Crisis, and now the Honduran Crisis.

In computer terms, the blinking cursor is a passive non-response to an instruction the CPU, for whatever reason, can't comprehend or process. I'm thinking this is pretty close to an accurate description of what's happening in Obama's head when events defy his own intentions, plans, and worldview. The Iranian people got in the way of his plan to negotiate with Ahmadinejad. The reality did not compute and he was unable to process it. The Honduran semi-coup does not compute with his plans to charm the world by negotiating equably with Chavez and the Castro brothers. Does not compute.

But it better compute. This is a world in which serious and unexpected events happen all the time. Like an airline pilot who is paid not for all the routine flights but for the moments of sheer terror that require instant action, the President of the United States is paid at least as much for his responses to catastrophe as he is for the policies he soberly noodles out with his experts.

If Obama can't make decisions when things go differently than he expects, we're all in a ton of trouble. Republicans and Democrats alike.




Wednesday, July 01, 2009


The Cream King Trove


MORE. The old Boomer Bible Forum folks are checking in, here and in emails, so I'm responding to their requests for more explanation of the archaeological dig that turned up "proof" of the punk writer movement. It's hotly contested to this day, but there are multiple manuscripts that argue for the existence of the movement that produced The Boomer Bible and much else. Here's an excerpt from just one:

The Punk City Paradox

Chapter 1

Punk City, born of Kain, and all its wings, will fail,
Falling toward Eden, widout a sound, in the mutement
Of allathings what never were, nor will be,
The undecoming of the inpossible, what may not be,
Nor would be, all gulpated by the intrails of the Raven...
                                    - Excerpt from CKT MS No. 616


        There are no photographs in the Cream King Trove. In their place are paintings, unschooled mockeries of works by the great masters of every age. The three large classrooms containing the relics of “Early Punk” include the most outrageous of these, cartoonish parodies of twentieth century masterpieces. There are stacks of them. Hopper’s Nighthawks at the Diner transmogrified to Philadelphia’s South Street, where punks with pancaked faces and black-rimmed eyes hunch over coffee at The Rattery, perusing Cliff Notes of MacBeth, Pride and Prejudice, and Portnoy’s Complaint. Picasso’s Three Musicians, renamed The Shuteye Train, rendered in hallucinogenic reds, blues and greens, with a fourth incongruous figure wedged into the tableau as if cut and pasted from the painter’s earlier blue period.
        Sapinaire’s portrait of Verrone, redone in blacks and blues as a Tarot card of The Boss, which may represent the first king of Punk City—if we can trust the intuition which seeks to reassemble its cubist fragments into a real human face. But it is difficult to trust one’s intuition about punk artifacts, and the more so with this painting, because it may be the only surviving image of the punk ‘demortal’ known as St. Nuke.
        He is the central enigma of the Philadelphia punk phenomenon. If it existed, and if he existed, St. Nuke is the key to unlocking its secrets. He runs through all the punks’ abundant and wildly contradictory histories of themselves. He is by turns a god, a mythic king, a dueling Renaissance dilettante, a maniacal tyrant, a passionate lover, a self-destructive rock star, a dogmatically puritanical pagan priest, an inspired spiritual and artistic leader, a satanic villain. The blurred and fragmented visage which stares at us from his maybe portrait is a visual analogy rather than a resolution of the ambiguities. St. Nuke’s essence, whatever it is or was, has been concealed from us by the filters of the punks’ borrowed styles of painting and writing. And so we yearn for just one photograph, one single cracked and fading Polaroid of a real human being to put with the name of St. Nuke. For even the matter of his human-being-ness remains somehow an unsafe assumption.
        But why does it matter? To what end has this distinguished old classroom building at Eberhard College in rural Pennsylvania been converted to an archaeological museum and laboratory? Outside, the college’s smooth lawns are perfumed with dew and bright with the cut-grass green of spring. Inside, the dry remains of a bizarre urban subculture lie dead in labeled plastic bags awaiting the revivification of understanding. Students scarcely older than were the vanished punks at their height scurry like coroner’s clerks among the lab tables, inspecting microscopic clues as if in search of an exact cause of death to write on the certificate. But there are no certificates, not of death or birth. The questions that consume these students and their professors are much more basic: What is this stuff? Who made it? Where did they come from? Where did they go? And why, in all the world, is this assemblage of junk the only evidence that anything out of the ordinary happened on Philadelphia’s South Street two decades ago?
        No one disputes that there were punks on South Street. Like New York, Philadelphia had its own contingent of the rock-and-roll rebels who, according to music historian Tricia Henry, “broke all the rules and declared war on all previously existing musical trends and rules of social behavior.” In the late 1970s, South Street was the logical place for such a community to congregate. And if casual witnesses are to be believed, congregate they did. Half a dozen punk nightclubs sprang up along the rat-infested street whose roots are sunk in Philadelphia’s colonial era, and Yuppies now gray at the temples recall that black-garbed punks came out at night to roam the tree-lined stretch of asphalt that merged with the circus atmosphere of historic Headhouse Square. There were the usual Sex Pistol lookalikes, minor league versions of Wendy O. Williams, and endless variations on the costumes and makeup of The Rocky Horror Picture Show (which in those days reigned at South Street’s TLA theater in midnight shows all weekend long). Those with strong sensory memories claim that bass chords rippled underfoot along the brick sidewalks, shivering the tired mortar of bars, punk clothing shops, and second-hand musical equipment stores. The only trouble is, the punks of the Cream King Trove were not musicians but writers, and their histories claim that they ruled South Street—owned it, guarded it, and fought wars to keep outsiders out. This does not square with the recollections of most.
        Yet the evidence of the Trove is physical, substantial, at times incredible, but undeniably present and provocative. The inventory records list 643 items of (nonmusical) computer equipment of a configuration claimed by no current manufacturer; 13,262 computer disks of unique physical design and data format; 1,159 weapons, including 454 bullwhips and 502 ‘swords’ fashioned mostly from extra-long screwdrivers, many showing trace amounts of human blood; 3,844 items of clothing, including combat coats armor-plated with green plastic circuit boards, blood-soaked gloves, and welded steel helmets evocative of bronze-age designs, as well as female apparel ranging from the frankly erotic to combat-scarred Amazonian; 108 paintings; 921 paper manuscript scrolls, most of them eaten by mold and mildew from the outside in, so that there are many beginnings but maddeningly few endings; 16 issues of a newspaper called The Punk City Shriek (sans photographs); five decks of well-worn tarot cards, each of unique design and nomenclature; 126 broken sheetrock panels covered with hand-painted script in a punk-pidgin dialect called The Tung; one Egyptian-style sarcophagus (empty); four plaster murals adorned with brilliantly colored hieroglyphics; 88 ‘band’ flags or pennons; and more than 200 isolated artifacts, including such items as a five pound sledge, a lock of hair, an eyepatch, a small vial of elaborately cut crystal, and what can only be described as a full-combat motorcycle featuring a computerized sonic ‘silencer.’
        Confronted by such a mass of unexplained relics, one seeks a focus, a recognizable starting point. The one the punks nominate again and again in their writings is of unexpectedly childlike origin, encrusted in layers of riddle and myth.

        The Shuteye Train

        The painting hangs over Lynn Wyler’s desk behind a protective slab of glass.
        “It’s the only one,” she explains, “the only image we have on canvas of the Shuteye Train.”



        She gazes at it with an almost devotional raptness, her head tilted slightly upwards as if to receive a blessing or rebuke. A lovely young woman dressed in a prim wool jumper, she seems an unlikely candidate for obsession. Yet that is a word she has become comfortable with.
        “Maybe it’s because I remember hearing it as a child,” she says, breaking her connection with the painting to smile at her own intensity. “The name is from a nursery rhyme, you know. My mother used to read it to me. I was all tucked in and safe, and her voice was so warm and soft.” Lynn’s voice remembers her mother’s and she recites from memory:

    Through the blue where bloom the stars
    And the Mother moon looks down
    We’ll away
    To land of Fay—
    Oh, the sights that we shall see there!
    Come, my little one, with me there—
    Tis a goodly train of cars—
    “All aboard for Shut-Eye Town!”


        She breaks off, blushing. “I can’t get it out of my head anymore,” she confesses. “I am obsessed. Until a month ago I was engaged to be married. But my fiancé got fed up. ‘You care more about the Shuteye Train than you do me,’ he said. And when I realized he was right, he saw it in my face and broke off it off. So here I am, the hostage of four cubist-looking guys who, according to all official accounts, never existed.”
        She pauses, then goes on in a lowered voice. “I probably shouldn’t tell you this but I do dream about them. They don’t look like the painting, but I still know it’s them, four figures in black coats. I see them pass through an intersection, no cars, no pedestrians, just them headed somewhere at night, and I run after them as hard as I can. But when I get to the corner and turn it, they’re gone.”
        She laughs at the suggestion that she is suffering from a classic anxiety dream. “Of course,” she says. “The obvious explanation. The problem is, there isn’t anything about this whole phenomenon that yields to obvious explanations. I think maybe that’s what this is all trying to tell us. Forget the obvious explanations. They may work everywhere else, but not here, not on South Street.   
        “Look,” she says, slipping into her pedagogical persona. “Everybody in this building is a scholar or technical expert of some kind.  We have all been imbued with the scientific method. We have been taught the discipline of logic and the perspective of absolute objectivity. And now here we sit, surrounded by this mountain of stuff—manuscripts, computer equipment, weapons, clothing, artwork, sacred relics—the archaeological remains of a fully developed subculture that simply cannot have existed. But does logic make this painting disappear, does it empty this building? No. Somewhere in all this stuff there's a fact, a reality, maybe even a truth of some kind. But everywhere we go to look for it we find filters in the way, like deliberate screens put there to keep us from seeing what happened. Because something did happen. There isn’t anybody working on this project who doesn’t believe that something happened, whether they admit it or not. And personally, I don’t think we’re going to make any headway at all until we admit the fact that we all do believe it happened, in spite of the evidence.”
        She holds up a stack of photocopied manuscripts. “And whatever it is that happened, it starts here, with the Shuteye Train. It’s one of the few points on which all the materials agree. The first verse of the Punk Testament says, “At the beginning there was the Shuteye Train.’ Every other punk account keeps saying the same thing in different ways.”
        She reads from the top of her stack:

    In Shuteye Town did Shuteye Train
    A nightmare children’s home ensee:
    Where Fish the secret symbol reigned
    O’er boomers destified for Kain
    Deep in a quantum sea.
   

        And again:

    The sleeping car that snores along on bloody tracks,
    The tired pullman that drones our song on bloody tracks
    Gave tongue to all our hammered dreams of morning.

   
        And again:

I return to the day a week or so before when I first arrived on South Street, where I had come in search of an entity known as the Shuteye Train, rumors of which had circulated as far north as my home in Boston... The Shuteye Train, it was said, wrote vicious stories live on stage, then went out and made them come true. I heard that they were maniacs, that they were murderers, that they lived in hiding, somewhere between half a step and a step and a half ahead of the law.

        Lynn Wyler stops to clear her throat and observes, “There’s more, of course. A lot more. And these are just the fragmentary manuscripts we found in the Trove. When—if—our computer jocks crack the code on the disks, there are bound to be thousands, maybe even tens of thousands, of pages we know nothing about today.”
        How, then, does she go about her work? Is anything known for sure, and what has she concluded about the Shuteye Train?
        She is more than willing to talk, to explain, to speculate, but she will not lay claim to knowledge.
        “We are given their names. Loco Dantes is their leader. You’ll find evidence of that in The Boomer Bible. The other three are Pig Millions, Reedy Weeks, and Joe Kay. These are obviously symbolic, selected names, but then so are all the other names in Punk City. Eliot Naughton declares in his preface to The Boomer Bible that the Philadelphia Police knew of an organization, or something, called the Shuteye Train. That’s intriguing because the Naughton preface is otherwise adamant in its dismissal of the value and reality of the punk writer phenomenon. But Naughton died in 1995 and we don’t know where he got his information. I should tell you this is a touchy subject with me.
        “Eliot Naughton had a brother, Thomas, also a professor of literature, at Princeton I think, who inherited whatever records Eliot left behind.  He’s recently published a book of his own on the subject—An Autopsy of Punk Authors or some such condescending title—and it’s the damnedest thing I’ve ever read. The book contains some real information. But it’s fundamentally untrue in that it purports to know all kinds of things that are no more than patronizing guesswork. He’s managed to beg, borrow, or steal a handful of punk pieces—many of them tiny fragments of larger works—which he presumes to analyze and explain as if he had read the entire manuscript. His selections are not representative of the scope and variety of punk writing, and his introductions to individual pieces are nothing more than preemptive dismissals
         "Worse than that, the book is just plain terrible, a thudding academic bore. It’s as if he deliberately wrote it to be unreadable. He’s got it so larded with pompous nonsense and sententious academic prose that it’s impossible not to think Naughton’s real purpose is to sabotage the publishing prospects of everyone working on this project. I’d like to jam the ridiculous crap he made up about Loco Dantes and the Shuteye Train right down his lying throat. And what really steams me is that he’s obviously got a mole in here feeding him some of our material, which is not supposed to be freely available, and artifacts, which are never supposed to leave here for any reason. Which means he knows it’s not a simple-minded, easily dismissed phenomenon. But his book treats it as an accepted reality that’s just not very interesting when a real scholar takes the time to concoct enough dismissive lies and misrepresentations about it. I’d love to know who’s pushing his buttons on this, and I’d love to read some of his files, but if I ever meet him I’ll probably light into him so hard I won’t get to find out anything. Oh well, that’s off the subject. I won’t bore you with any more on that fiasco.
        “What it boils down to is, there’s not much to go on except what we already have here. Nobody I’ve talked to in the Philly PD will even acknowledge the existence of the Shuteye Train. So that leaves us with the records in the Trove, except for Frank Frelinger, of course, the last person to claim an encounter with them, which was described in the second preface to The Boomer Bible.
        “I interviewed Frelinger and came away with the sense that he had a hidden agenda of his own. He was keenly interested in why I was questioning him, and he seemed to have learned more than I’d have thought possible about the Trove research effort. I don’t assign any particular weight to his contention that he’s had contact with the Shuteye Train, but I don’t necessarily regard him as a liar either. It could well be that he’s just a journalist who fell into a story he can’t get away from.
         “That’s nothing new, though. The prose passage I read you was supposedly written by Boz Baker, the famous ‘new journalist’ of the sixties and seventies. He died during the period when the punk phenomenon was presumably still underway, and critics familiar with his work have told me they believe the Trove fragment attributed to him is his writing. So he may be a credible witness, but all we have of his account is a few pages, he’s not available for questioning, obviously, and he never claims in the material we possess to have seen the Shuteye Train in person. Apocryphally, Boz Baker became obsessed with Alice Hate, the de facto queen of Punk City, and lost interest in everyone and everything else. For my purposes he turns out to be ancillary material. Still, he’s another ‘real world’ witness to the supposed ‘unreal world’ of Punk City.
        “Which leaves me to look for the Shuteye Train in other ways. In the Trove, we have only a hanful of fiction fragments attributed to their authorship. We have numerous references to them in punk history—that is, what purports to be history but more closely resembles mythology because of its apparent preference for semiotics over facts. And we have an overall pattern of punk iconography that seems to originate with the Shuteye Train and continues to proliferate, most notably on the Internet. That’s the angle I’m pursuing now.
        But what of the story, she is asked. Isn’t there a real human story to find amidst the tales of an undying punk writer band called the Shuteye Train?
        She laughs, peals of genuine merriment. “Certainly there’s a story. There are many stories.  Every story line you could imagine is in there. At least, that’s my bet. But if you’re looking for a single line, an epic Punk City story, if you will, you have to be tolerant of contradictions and confusion. You wind up having to back your way out of all the conflicting detail accounts to the point where everything blurs, to the point of myth really, and then you get a community coming of age story that goes some-thing like this—
        “In the late 1970s, maybe 1978, there’s a kind of second-string punk rock community living on South Street. It’s just an imitation, really, of what’s happening in new York and London. But these aren’t the punks of the Cream King Trove. The punks that go on to leave us all this are the losers and hangers-on of South Street., the ones who can’t even get into one of the rock bands. The Boomer Bible speaks of ‘the lowest of the low’ and it seems apt here. The punk writers speak of themselves at this stage as being ‘noth-ing’ in the truest sense of the word.
        “But then some kind of crisis comes to South Street. Symbolically at least, it comes in the form of a biker gang which takes over the drug territory of which the community is a geographical part. The bikers run roughshod over the punks. There are beatings, rapes, murders, a campaign of intimidation and terror.
    “Now the police will tell you that this never happened, that there was never any overt biker presence on South Street at this time. That’s why I refer to a symbolic event. The important thing about it is that it represents some kind of ultimate ordeal, a crucible that wreaks a transformation. That’s where the Shuteye Train comes in.
        “You see, there is a moment in there somewhere that we can’t find. We can’t find it but it has to be there. A moment of inspiration or rebirth that alters the context, invisibly perhaps but profoundly. The underlying nature of the circumstances acquires a radically different identity. What had been nothing but a sordid vignette of drug abuse and aimless youth becomes, in the blink of an eye, a heroic and even sacred quest for meaning, redemption, and salvation. Imagine watching a movie about gang-bangers in an L.A. barrio and then somewhere in the middle of the first act you realize you’re watching the Iliad instead—a full-blown literal dramatization with Greeks and Trojans in crested helmets—and you have no recollection of the transition. That’s the scale of context change I’m talking about, and it’s the same kind of change. That’s why it’s also the key to whatever happened on South Street in the late seventies. In the punk accounts, this change is represented in terms of dramatic physical conflict.
        “The hostility between punks and bikers erupts suddenly into war. Not a skirmish, but a war. All accounts use the word. Something has made the South Streeters resist. A mysterious ‘it’ has intervened and empowered the punks. Even though the challenge they face is terrifying. Here, let me read to you from the fragment we call the Gypsy manuscript:

It is an effort, even now, to recall this time, an eternity of fear and blood and death that made each night into an abyss. I watched or heard it all unfold outside my window, deep inside the hell of South Street, where the bikes rolled in at midnight and out again before dawn. In between my memories are splintered and painful as shattered bone. The gang had a leader, a man with a hammer, who withstood every assault like a cliff. He appeared one night in December when it seemed the punks were at last growing stronger than the bikers.... It was then that the Duke spoke, in a loud hoarse voice. “I be ready to settle this thing for good right now. One on one. The best you got against me.”

        There is a low, thrilling power in Lynn’s voice as she utters the words of “the Duke.” It is obvious that she can see the scene unfolding in her mind’s eyes. More of her dreams, one wonders? But she resumes her exposition in a normal scholarly tone.
        “To me, the important part of this passage is, ‘memories... splintered and painful as shattered bone.’ It’s my theory that this is the key to the beginning. It won’t come together for us because it’s not together for them, either. It’s like some terrible wound that can’t heal—a wound that may have elevated them but which has also bequeathed them a permanent legacy of pain. They come back to this moment of their history again and again and again because they want to perceive, directly if they can, the origin of this incredible, ennobling and agonizing gift. But no matter how many times and ways they tell the story of their beginnings, they can’t quite get back to the real origin. There is a point at which the physics of punk reality crumbles into jagged mismatched shards of quasi-remembrance. And interestingly to me at least, this ‘shattered’ effect is strikingly present at the very climax of the war event, just where you’d expect a purely mythological structure to enforce some unity.
        “You can see the problem most clearly in the confusion of identities that runs through this episode. For example, the Gypsy manuscript is the only eyewitness account we’ve found so far of the pivotal showdown between the punks and the bikers. The way he tells it, the Duke turns his challenge into a ritual that is repeated every night: ‘The best you got against me.’ An invitation to single combat that sounds straight out of the middle ages. When he’s finally taken up on his challenge, who is it that comes forward to fight him?

But as everyone looked one to another, searching for the source of the voice, four masked men dressed in black stepped out of the ECCE doorway and crossed the street through the snow, silent as wraiths.

        “The Shuteye Train,” Lynn explains. “’Four masked men dressed in black’ is absolutely standard iconography for the Shuteye Train. It just can’t be anyone else. And so it’s Loco Dantes of the Shuteye Train who engages in combat with the Duke, and it’s Loco Dantes who ‘stuck an icepick in the monster’s ear, deep into his murderous brain.’

The Duke dropped to his knees, a look of astonishment wiping the menace from his face, and then he pitched forward, blood pouring from his ear onto the white blanket of his deathbed.

        “And then, bang!” Lynn continues, “Just like that, according to Gypsy, the war is finished and the ‘punk writer’ phenomenon takes over. The coming of age that is the rest of the punk story has been initiated, and it has acquired the momentum that will push it forward through the remainder of the history. Thus, it is the beginning which is most important to all subsequent punk writers.
        When you look at this beginning for the purpose of explaining the primacy of the Shuteye Train, the Gypsy account of the duel between Loco Dantes and the Duke serves as a fascinating clue to their symbolic identity. For this is the precise moment at which the punks cease to be nothing, when they become victors instead of losers and are enabled to manage their own destinies.
        “That’s not how most of the punk writings we’ve found describe this episode. Despite Gypsy’s account—and Gypsy is an important figure, we believe, who went on to become a power in Punk City—it is St. Nuke who is given credit for killing the Duke. The book of Angels in the Punk Testament says, ‘Whereupon St. Nuke planted an icepick in his ear, all the way to the handle, which slew the one called the Duke, before he hit the ground.’ The physical details are the same, but the identity of the protagonist is changed. While the Shuteye Train waits mysteriously and implacably down the street, the king figure plays the vital role.”
        Which version takes precedence with Lynn Wyler? “Neither,” she responds. “Gypsy’s is the eyewitness account, but this does not mean that his version carries more weight than the book of Angels, which is, after all, the document purporting to contain the collective memory of Punk City. One could take the obvious cheap shot and say that it’s the ‘official’ version, the one that’s politically correct in a community writing effort being managed by the hero of the story, but that, to my mind, is an unnecessarily cynical explanation of the discrepancy. I think there’s a sense in which they work best together.
        “Gypsy never says that the slayer of the Duke is Loco Dantes. He has used literary language that makes the Shuteye Train unmistakably present at the scene, just as Angels uses scriptural language to do the same thing. Both could be saying, ‘It’s as if the Shuteye Train were there in person, ensuring that the punks would prevail. The outcome is the same in both versions, as is the clear implication that the decisive factor is this invincible presence that resides in no single person, including the king.”
        Lynn Wyler smiles. “There are those in Agley Hall who will tell you that questions about the Shuteye Train pale beside the questions about St. Nuke. I acknowledge that perspective, but I don’t want to dwell on it. I’ll just point out that if the punk writer movement occurred, St. Nuke will be confirmed as an historical personage, a living breathing human being who led his people to a fairly notable accomplishment. This cannot be said of the Shuteye Train. There is every chance that they were, in the context of Punk City, the personification of an article of faith, not a physical but a metaphysical presence of extraordinary gravity and authority. If that’s the case, then it will be impossible to understand anything about the punk writers without understanding how and why  they came to believe so fiercely in the Shuteye Train.”
        She smiles again, this time at the suggestion that she already has her own answers to such questions. “Provisional answers,” she concedes. “Theirs, I believe, is the power of untraceable memory, the authority of a reference that seems to predate any meaning to which it refers. Like me, some one or ones in Punk City had heard a nursery rhyme in childhood and developed a series of implied associations—of comfort, meaning, and significantly, of journeying—which were triggered into mental and emotional reality by the identity crisis arising from adolescent drug addiction. The result was a subconscious but exceptionally powerful return to the innocence and belief of earliest childhood, which—if any of us could manage it—would indeed seem like a rebirth. The courage to fight back comes from seeming flight into a fantasy realm where reality itself is diminished in intensity and immediacy.”
        Does this mean that the Shuteye Train should be understood as a kind of mass delusion, or worse than that, as a mass hallucination of childish figments of the imagination? And doesn’t such an explanation reduce the ‘epic’ punk story to a cheap allegory, like some Hollywood western? The Duke is drugs. The Shuteye Train is dreams. And when they face each other down at high noon, the good dreams outdraw the evil drugs?
        Lynn seems taken aback for a moment, then recovers her composure. “That’s not how I think of it,” she says. “I’m inclined to the idea that the Shuteye Train begins as an accepted symbol without a deterministic meaning, but as the punks grow in knowledge and experience, the preexisting symbol is used to embody the value system that has been developed along the way. In this sense, it’s a microcosm of the human relationship to the notion of divinity. The image of God appears first and accrues successive layers of metaphysical identity which reflect the minds of the believers as they learn more about themselves and the universe.”
        But is the Shuteye Train nonetheless real? Time, it seems, for a very pointed question: Does Lynn Wyler believe in God? She blushes at the question, crosses her arms, glances toward the door. “What I believe,” she says slowly and distinctly, “is that we are all waiting for the code on the Trove disks to be broken. And while we wait, we are hoping for a miracle—recovery of the lost testament of the punks. The Apunkrypha. I will cheerfully change any or all of my pet theories if The Apunkrypha shows me a new way to understand it all. Now, if you’ll excuse me, I have to get back to work.”

In case you're interested.




Back to Archive Index

Amazon Honor System Contribute to InstaPunk.com Learn More