Instapun***K.com Archive Listing
InstaPunk.Com

Archive Listing
July 31, 2011 - July 24, 2011

Tuesday, August 31, 2010


Ultimate ad absurdem


DON'T FORGET THE GLOSSARY. Ordinarily I don't post if I have nothing to add. But this is too good not to post. And even the usual airy-fairy Hotair characterization seems, uh, appropriate. We wouldn't want to drown out the sound file with our impolitic falling-on-the-floor guffaws, now would we?

Oh. Yeah. We do have a little something to add. An entry from the Y2000 Who's Who in Shuteye Nation. (Hard to think we've been tracking this asswipe for 10 years, isn't it?)

Bill Priss. Liberal° political° pundit° and eunuch co-host of CTN's Crosswire. Who says you have to be intelligent to be a successful political commentator? What you have to do is start talking, keep talking, and don't stop talking, especially if there are guests or anybody else on camera who doesn't agree that the best political system is one in which every dime of the Gross National Product is pissed away in a futile attempt to protect 260 million fat cowards from the dangers of being free.

CORRECTION: It's not called the Gross National Product anymore. It's called the Gross Domestic Product. A change that came in the same year, I suspect, when Democrats switched from commie red to existentially blue on the electoral map and Republicans from patriotic blue to raging racist red. That kind of thing.





Shut Up and Act

"What I'm seeing is not real." No kidding.

LOVED THAT CONAIR
. So needless. I like this guy as an actor. Why must he insist on driving me (and 150 million other Americans) out of his audience?

John Cusack wants ‘Satanic Death Cult Center at Fox News HQ’
Tweeting left-wing actor whines about ‘haters’ while calling Glenn Beck ‘racist’ and ‘fascist.’

By Matt Philbin
Culture and Media Institute
August 30, 2010

Want a tutorial in the hypocrisy, vitriol and deep unhappiness of the American left? You don’t need to subject yourself to MSNBC, or wade through the muck of Daily Kos. Actor John Cusack’s Twitter feed is a clearing house for liberal memes and nasty rhetoric.

Here’s his peaceful entry from Aug. 29 [All spelling from original Tweets, but Cusack admits: “I type with I phone fast and loose with no spellcheck.”]

Johncusack: I AM FOR A SATANIC DEATH CULT CENTER AT FOX NEWS HQ AND OUTSIDE THE OFFICES ORDICK ARMEYAND NEWT GINGRICH-and all the GOP WELFARE FREAKS

Presumably, this is a reference to the controversy over the Ground Zero Mosque. And “all the GOP WELFARE FREAKS” seems to follow on this theme:

Johncusack: taht's the gop philospy.. gourge the stae while claiming to be rugged individuaist who live by the free market - biggest joke there is..

Johncusack: think of our the us treasury as the last frontier to be stripped mined if only pesky gov itelf wasn't in the way.

Johncusack: privatized gains- socialized loses-- complete hippcorites

But elsewhere, Cusack said Glenn Beck (at his “Restoring Honor” rally) was “unifying whites -class war of blame and fear” and said Beck was starting a “class war to capitallize on economy they destroyed” – a strange accusation from a man that claims the GOP wants to gut the treasury. And what liberal rant would be complete without the leftist’s two favorite pejoratives? Back’s [sic[ tactics, he wrote were “strraigjt fr tfriendly racist playbiook.” A minute later, Cusack added, “Sorry frendly fascist playbook."

Elsewhere, he wrote: “[Charles] krathhammers a joke son please do me a fav and dont watch.” He called another Tweeter a “flag sucking halfwit,” presumably for the sin of patriotism.

Strong words from a man who also Tweeted about having “to weed out all the little trolls who can't bare it when someone has an opinion they dont like.” He “blocked as many haters as i could a i still can't get below 200 thou,” but confessed, “i guess someone turned off the automatic hate spewing machine.. i kind of miss them.”

Whew! Glad some of the hate’s gone from Twitter.

Cusack, who, according to OpenSecrets.org gave $1,000 to Vice President Biden’s 2008 presidential campaign, has a long history of using strident partisan rhetoric. He called the Bush administration “criminally incompetent robber barons,” and “the neo-con/White House Iraq Group lunatics,” and demanded that Attorney General Eric Holder imprison the guilty Bush officials. He also did an anti-McCain ad for the far-left group MoveOn.org.

Because he thinks he's a highly educated intellectual? If so, then why drop out of college in your first year? I don't get it.

Oh, that's right. I forgot. His background is available to see at Wiki:

Cusack was born in Evanston, Illinois, to an Irish Catholic family. His father, Dick Cusack (1925–2003), and siblings Ann, Joan, Bill, and Susie, are also actors; his father was also a documentary filmmaker, owned a film production company, and was a friend of activist Philip Berrigan. Cusack's mother, Nancy (née Carolan), is a former mathematics teacher and political activist. Cusack spent a year at New York University before dropping out, saying that he had "too much fire in his belly".

I can see the 'too much fire in the belly thing.' For acting. But it pretty much eliminates your credibility when it comes to anything else. And all he does is hurt himself.  He can't spell. He can't write a grammatical sentrence. He can't think (as if Twitter allowed for that anyway...)

It's not like his career is on fire. What's he done since ConAir, the high point of actions pics before The Expendables? A few horror movies? I don't get it. Somebody please explain.

The closest I can come to understanding is the experience I used to have when I was a management consultant travelling on planes all the time. I realized that your seatmates were more likely to tell you the truth about their lives than they would their closest friends. I was particularly interested in lawyers. They always told me they hated their lives. Hated being lawyers.

Maybe it's the same for actors. Despite all the money. When people love and admire you, it's never you they love and admire. Only a character you played. Maybe as you approach your middle years, that becomes a cross to bear (or should that be "bare"?) You're old enough that you should be a grownup. But you're still nothing but a face. You want to matter, even if it cuts your future audience in half.

Help me out here.

The thing is, there are consequences to our decisions. You became an actor. You're good at emoting. You have a knack for memorizing lines. You have money. People turn your way when you speak. But you dropped out of NYU before you turned 20. A trade you made. When people turn your way, they're looking at your face. Period. They're not looking for you to educate them. That's what you gave up. You're a high school kid who became a movie star.

What am I missing? Why should we listen? Why should we care? Why should we keep coming to your movies if you're intent on being a sanctimonious dick?




Monday, August 30, 2010


Little Boxes

The irony is so thick you could cut it with a dull Olbermann.
 
HARVARD CLASS OF JFK. The title of this post was inspired by an essay by Laura Brod over at Hotair's Green Room. It's called The Little Glass Box of the American Left and it says, in part:

Last year was quite an experience as I was encouraged to run for Minnesota Governor. While ultimately I decided not to run, during that process, I was flooded with questionnaires from organizations seeking my views or trying to influence my opinions. One of the things which surprised me, though, is the nature of the questions I was asked by some organizations.

What particularly caught my eye was a questionnaire from a “Women’s” group. What were the questions? The majority of them were about abortion, gay marriage, and how much we should expand big government spending.

In the midst of the deepest recession in living memory and international uncertainties, those don’t strike me — or most people — as the issues keeping women (or men) up at night.
Where were the ideas of economic freedom and economic opportunity? Where were the questions about challenges that women business owners face in small business start-ups which are the mainstay of Main Streets throughout the country? Where were the questions about the national debt and its impact on our children’s future? Where were the questions about how we best educate the children of our country so that we have a qualified and well positioned workforce? This list goes on and on.

This self-described “women’s” group and many like it are more interested in litmus tests on liberal social issues than on what will materially improve women’s lives in the real day-to-day world where we are raising kids, struggling to make ends meet, and hoping that we or our spouses don’t lose their job (or will find one soon).

For decades now we have talked about the glass ceiling women once faced, and to a certain extent still do. But I am more worried about the glass box that liberal feminists have placed women and “women’s issues” in, all tied up with a pretty pink bow. That glass box is all about keeping women and “women’s issues” firmly in their place on the left side of the political spectrum.

But isn't that what identity politics are all about, as practiced by the left? There's the Little Black Box of African-American racialist politics, the Little Brown Box of hispanic amnesty politics, the Little Hypochondriac Box filled with people who want to see their doctor every week and get their drugs for free, the Little Senior Box of frightened Social Security and Medicare recipients, the Little Green Box of "save the planet" totalitarians, the Little Card-Check Box of union members who want what they want regardless, the Little Homosexual Box peopled by those who want you to not only watch but cheer their bedroom activities, and the Little Atheist Box of secularists who want the Judeo-Christian God (exclusively) run out of the body politic, so that there's more room for the Little Muslim Box, the Little Buddhist Box, the Little Wiccan Box, and the not-so-little I-Hate-America Box.

All of these are supposed to be defined by a handful of box-specific issues whose only point of commonality is that they give the government more power to tell everyone in the country what to do. Democratic unity consists of chaining these separate, discrete boxes together into a permanent voting majority under the absolute control of a federal establishment run by Ivy League lawyers consisting of (overwhelmingly) white men and (a few useful idiot) white women.

Everything that applies to the glass box described by Laura Brod at Hotair also applies to the people who are supposed to occupy all the other little boxes. African-Americans who are pro-life, pro-choice when it comes to alternatives to the union-mandated incompetencies of government schools, and pro-small business because they own one or would like to are banished from the box (with prejudice and sometimes minstrel cartoons) as Uncle Toms. It's unimaginable to Harry Reid and other Dems that any American of Hispanic descent wouldn't prefer the Little Brown Box to border enforcement, the rule of law, and state governments that aren't bankrupted by non-paying parasites on local healthcare, education, law enforcement, judicial, and child welfare resources for which they pay taxes like other law-abiding citizens. The Little Senior Box is supposed to be a wholly owned subsidiary of the AARP lobby, with no thought about the burden and legacy of debt being piled up on their children or grandchildren or the potentially fatal results of having financially stressed governments more in charge of their declining years than doctors. It's impossible for progressives to imagine that people could care about the environment, ecology, and endangered species without believing these goals are best accomplished by a regressive tax on resources that are still available -- and safe in terms of all our environmental ideals -- if we'd only let people look for them. Et cetera.

Just a couple of additional points to be made about the "box" mentality. There's nothing liberal, tolerant, hopeful. or truly forward-looking about it. It regards all people as intrinsically selfish and devoid of individuality, human moraility, and capacity for unity. None of us can ever transcend the initial boxes we check on a government form -- sex, race or ethnic origin, age, education level, income, and medical condition. When we check a box in one of these categories, that's our box, now and forevermore, and in progressive political calculus we damn well better stay there or be ridiculed as racists, sexists, homophobes, nativists, anti-science creationists, blah blah. In point of fact, it's the grimmest kind of reductionism, the ultimate denial of the value of the experience of life itself. Only the wise white power lords of the federal government can be trusted to keep us from each other's throats as we slash at each other with the sharpest blades of our narrowest interests. The idea that these boxes might just be individual pots for seedlings whose produce grows freely upward and outward into a delightful natural garden that kens and glories in the whole is beyond the soulless, geometric view of human existence progressive box collectors prefer.

The second point is esthetic but not really subsidiary. Listen -- really listen -- to the song video up top. Pete Seeger is/was a liberal icon. Who was thinking of little boxes first? Pay particular attention to his repeated mentions of the most important little box of all -- The Little University Box. He and his ilk captured that box first. (And they're still drinking their martinis, aren't they?) And the box metaphor was the basis for how they set about conquering the rest of us. By a process of annexation, box by box, until they had a string of addends that looked to them like unity, as far as people of their collective mentality could ever understand unity. Note his tone -- the avuncular, friendly, approachable contempt of his "folk music." Note, too, the fatal error of scale that betrays the narrowness of his vision: he lists "business" as a box.

It may be. But it's one gigantically huge and kaleidoscopic box that contains 90+ percent of everything that real working people do to sustain themselves and each other. I don't need to do the butcher to candlestickmaker list. That's the box that contains almost all of us. But it's overridingly vital for them to keep us in a box and convince us that it's as small as all their other possessions.

It isn't.


Seeger's boxes. Just subtract the cheery brightness.

The box that really isn't a box is the United States of America.


Glenn Beck's America. He said, "no signs."
Do you see any signs? They're just citizens.

Do you remember the archaic term "melting pot?" This explanation won't make any sense to those of you who have never eaten a stew or vegetable soup. So if you're one of the ones who always eats all the ingredients of your meals separately, one dish for each ingredient, I apologize. My metaphor will fall flat. But the melting pot idea never suggested that a pea would stop being a pea, a potato a potato, a beef cube a beef cube, an onion an onion, etc, just because it was part of a delicious entree. The idea was that the stew was more than the sum of its ingredients, nothing lost and much gained.

Try eating a stew unmixed ingredient by unmixed ingredient, unwashed, uncut, unseasoned, unsimmered together, each with a sign that says, "I'm celery and I'm mad," or "I'm beef and I feel guilty for what I'm doing to your colon," or "I'm a Scottish leek. Don't eat me; I taste like shit." That's what we call the progressive dream. Tasty, ain't it?
 





President 'Bummo

Fifteen years ago, when my daughter was 10,
she would have loved this pic. She's 25 now.

UUUUH. Sorry. Just can't take him seriously anymore. There were five Marx Brothers. Groucho, Chico, Harpo, Zeppo, and Gummo. Only three of them were funny. Same with the other Marx brothers: Karl, Mao, Castro, Hugo, and Bummo.

Zeppo and Gummo quit to become Hollywood publicists. Hugo and Bummo quit to become sideshow clowns. Same thing.

You disagree? Sideshow clown as Hollywood publicist? Try this video. TRANSLATION:

President Obama criticizes the economic policies of former President Bush and the current "partisan minority" in Congress. Obama asks Republicans to drop the economic "blockade."

Huh? The Prez holds veto-proof majorities in both houses of congress and he's waxing bellicose about a minority BLOCKADE? Kewl! Truly inspired drollery? No. Mere publicityspeak, Bummo style.

I know. I know, you're tempted to say he's doing a pretty good impression of Groucho from Duck Soup:


I grant you the pomp and circumstance. And the casting of Michelle is
  persuasively comedy-haute couture, though typically Photoshopped-slim.

But I don't see any teleprompters. Or any of the concupiscience. Or the wit. Or the self-conscious self-contradiction (That's what had us fooled at first.) He believes his own dumb punchline. Publicist. Oh well.

The various Marx Brothers "Droppos" all had the same weakness. When they tried to be funny, they weren't. When they tried to be serious, they were ridiculous. Something about pompous Patrician out-of-touchness we presume.


uh, yeah. Sorry. Forgot to mention Johnno. Good friend of
Bummo. Sheryl Crow affirms they both use ONE square.


Did you wave at them? Good girls. We're proud of you.

All kidding aside. Two years in. Everything is still his predecessor's fault? Even if it were true, it's no sign of a man, a leader, or a president. He's just a nerd riding a little girl's bike with a silly helmet he thinks is proof against everything from bird droppings to flat-out stompings. The bird droppings are the last remaining fallout from the Bush administration. The stompings are the product of his own spectacularly misguided and destructive policies.


You can supply the sound effects for yourself.

Good luck with that, Bummo. It really isn't funny. Even burlesque costumery can't cover that up.

So. If the Obama presidency were a parrot...



uh, yeah. You get the picture. Nailed to the perch. For two more years.




Friday, August 27, 2010


Leviathan

They're so so scared of her. Maybe the best instinct they've had in decades.

THE REAL FEMINISM. FINALLY. There's a lot of noise out there right now. Some of it is good, insightful noise. (Goldberg, Krauthammer, Jacoby, and Barone come to mind), but nobody knows what's going to happen in November. Everybody's treading water. The economy is sinking, the president is distracted and on vacation (Lobsters? Really?), a variety of Dems are jumping ship, and the polling numbers are either all or mostly junk. How do you choose what's worth focusing on?

The answer is Sarah Palin. Apart from Obama himself, she's the part of the national political equation that is new. I once pronounced her near-term presidential prospects as zero. Here was my reasoning:

[I]t's no joke that there's a problematic generation gap in the GOP. Much more than the Dems, whose ranks are filled with tottering greybeards like Biden, Byrd, Lautenberg, Teddy, Harkin, Specter, Mikulski, Murtha, Dingell, Rangel, and the plastic avatar Pelosi, the Republicans have a lot of promising young blood: Paul Ryan, Eric Kantor, Bobby Jindal, Sarah Palin, Scott Brown, Michelle Bachman, Liz Cheney, Marco Rubio, and no doubt others we haven't heard of. Young not just in years, though many of them are well below the age of gray hairs and their imputed wisdom, but also young in experience on the national stage. Problem is, we need leaders NOW, and the Old Guard is too old and compromised by their experience to serve in the capacity we need. John McCain, Newt Gingrich, Lindsey Graham, Rudy Giuliani, Orrin Hatch, John Boehner, John Kyl, etc, etc.

So there's a temptation to, well, do an 'Obama' right back at them. Pluck some charismatic juvenile out of the crib and force them to let us follow them to the ends of the earth. In an era of instant celebrity and reality show media fads, it even makes a certain kind of sense. Pick the best looking horse and ride on the back of off-the-chart Q-ratings to glory, acclaim, and power.

Thing is, it doesn't work. The Democrats are finding that out right now, in excruciating pain. They passed up the old warhorse Hillary for a three-year-old flash in the pan who can't run in the mud or, apparently, on a cloudy day. And who, day by day, seems to be revealing himself as something much less than a thoroughbred.

But I also said:

I wrote Palin off as soon as she resigned her governor's chair. But now I'm thinking maybe I misunderestimated her. Everything I know tells me she's not ready for national office. But women have their own ways of doing things. Let me repeat that. Women have their own ways of doing things. Sarah Palin is breaking ALL the rules, every day, consistent with how she's behaved from Day One of her national celebrity. I have absolutely no idea what's she's up to. Does that make her an idiot? Maybe. Unless it makes her something brand new.

It's interesting to me that women in particular never think of other women in terms of destiny. They think of other women in terms of hard work, dues paid, credentials acquired, scandals avoided or mitigated, but never ever EVER in terms of just showing up when destiny is calling, the way Napoleon and Lincoln did.

Because most women don't think of themselves that way. At base, they know they're second rate. They have to plot and connive and wriggle into positions of power. Obey the rules. All the rules. If they deviate, even once, they're done. Toast.

Which means that the thing they hate the most is another woman who just is. I have a leg up here because I'm married to one like that. Sarah Palin breaks all the rules, recklessly, fearlessly, apparently even self-destructively. But she's a comet. None of us knows where's she'll land, how, or why. If she were a man we could describe her as a running back loose in the secondary. She could dance her way to the end zone with one counter-intuitive move after another.

But she's a woman. Which is fatal.

Except that if we're being honest about our belief in the equality of the sexes, she just might be crafting a new way. Upending all the old rules. Destiny might be on her side after all. After Obama, America might be sick to death of 'brilliance,' and want instead a candid traditionalist with five kids and a healthy openness about how easy it is to get suckered by the mass media machine.

What value might Americans place on an 'anti-politician,' one who admits she's more like us than them, one who is as demonstrably fearless as she is professedly ordinary? And far more beautiful than all her female and geeky detractors? [boldface added in hindsight.]

I'm starting to take her very very seriously. Why? Several points.

1) Obama is even a worse president than I anticipated. Which is saying something. He's cold, remote, aloof, detached, imperious, indecisive, and incompetent. Jesus. Could it get any worse? Yeah, he doesn't have Carter's sneaky child molester smile, but he's a walking reminder of every over-educated arrogant asshole we've all met in real life. That's not going to change. His first response to any criticism or challenge is to ridicule it, usually in offensive terms that make it clear he's not from any of the lower forty-eight states and doesn't care to be. Which means it's not the whole celebrity act of the Obamas people are objecting to. It's who the celebrity turns out to be.

2) Worse, for a politician, he has no political loyalties. Ironically, he has no sense of the quid pro quo that builds coalitions and fortitude in tough times. He doesn't even realize he's a pol. He still thinks he's a messiah and it's okay to throw countless hundreds of his erstwhile allies under the bus while he skates coolly away from the fracas with his nose in the air.

3) Worst of all, Obama keeps getting credit for being smart, intellectual, accomplished. He's none of these things. But the damage has been done. After eight years of being told that George W. Bush was too dumb to be President, Americans are learning that the people who tell them who's smart and who isn't aren't using criteria that matter. They're being given every reason to revert to the common sense they apply in their own lives; sometimes the people who claim to be smart are just smart-ass, worth more laughter than deference. And think about this: Bush was supposedly dumb despite degrees from Yale and Harvard. But if the supposedly smarter president has nothing going for him but, uh, degrees from Columbia and Harvard, why shouldn't we conclude that if we think he's acting dumb, he is dumb? Even if he's got that snotty intellectual attitude we mostly despise.

4) It was Obama who changed all the rules about who and what we should consider in a national candidate. And how they can go about getting elected. So who is it that's dumb and who is it that's smart if the political herd on the national scene is playing by the old pre-Obama rules and one, just one, is making up all new rules of her own?

5) Sarah's running on Facebook fer chrissakes. Who's more in touch with the "working people" of the American electorate? Obama with his mysterious classified Blackberry? Or Sarah with her shoot from the hip talent for coining more memorable phrases than an over-exposed president has managed since his inauguration? Name me one term Obama has cemented into the public discourse that has more resonance than "death panels"?

6) People are onto the MSM at this point. Here's the proof. Throughout his years of candidacy and his years of presidency, the MSM went out of their way to depict Ronald Reagan as dumb. Does it even matter now whether they were wrong or right? People know Reagan was a good president. If he was dumb, brains don't matter as much as the MSM thinks they do. If he was smart, they were engaging in such systematic propaganda, we can't believe their intellectual assessments of anyone. QED.

7) Lucky Seven. Magnificent Seven. Sarah is vetted. Nothing left for the MSM to do to her. They've done to her, and worse, what the tabloid press does to Lindsey Lohan, Britney Spears, Paris Hilton, and Tiger Woods. Hell, they've even turned vicious queers loose to investigate the interior of her uterus, giving her the equivalent of an internal gynecological exam in the name of "journalism." (TIP to the Dancing with the Stars judges: condescend to Bristol at your peril. This is bigger than your sanctimony.) Despite all the best/worst efforts of the MSM, Sarah's still standing there, gathering power...


It's called Serenity.

...transforming herself into an anti-establishment kingmaker at the precise moment in time when people are the most disposed to be anti-establishment. She's eating her opposition for lunch. No wonder they're gasping, straining, like constipated schoolmarms on the pot, as Sarah rolls on smiling and laughing and tossing off memorable phrases while they splutter crankily in her wake, scouring the Internet for the lefty equivalent of stool softeners. Which is a delicate way of saying they're full of shit.

To conclude. Sarah Palin's not Obama or anything like him. She understands the social networking scene and is as far ahead of her competition as Obama's minions were ahead of theirs. Her less than elite educational credentials are no longer as suspect as the people who have questioned them so contemptuously. She understands better than the Republican Party just how fed up the electorate is. I think she's running for president. When I think about Romney and Huckabee and that doofus from Minnesota, I think she's winning. Whatever the polls say.

And I think everybody who opposes her, Democrat and Republican alike, should be afraid. Very afraid. Because she's the 800-pound gorillagrizzly in the room. And I'm getting more comfortable with the idea of a Sarah Palin presidency. She's not going to call Marines "corpsemen." She's not going to bow to men who stone women to death for getting raped. She knows that you don't revive an economy or a nation by punishing the people who do all the work. She knows what the American military can do, she understands that lives she cares about are on the line, and she won't make deployment decisions lightly. She's not enough of an intellectual to do any of those things. And if she chows down on a king crab leg at a state dinner, she'll know what it really cost to land it on her presidential plate.



Capitalism isn't soulless exploitation. It's people taking risks for rewards that go way beyond money and trust fund checks. What Sarah knows that Obama never will. Thanks to Obama, I'm prepared, finally, to accept the risk of Sarah. Hell. I'm an American. Let's roll.






Puck Punk's Anyfell
Preseasoning Review


Even these players try harder to win than the preasoning players.

[ED NOTE. We like to think of this as Affirmative Action Blogging. Obviously, Puck Punk has gone a bit backward with his English after the Census and the Bender and all, but it's a hands across the border kind of thing, isn't it? They don't even have football in Canada (except for that weird CFL thing they do on a field the size of Area 51), but never mind that. He's trying really really hard here. It's the thought that counts, eh...?]

A BREAK FROM THE HOCKEY...FOR NOW. I want to apologize to all bodies at The Punks for being away for a long time. I become many upset when my Canadiens lose to the Phyler in the anyshell playoff and I have the hard time coming to a grip on that. At that time I am very happy to be making so much money at my job for the census, but I spend every of my money at the liquor store to go on the bender at my sadness. When I wake up, I have find out all the census job are go away, even for my boss. But he shows me how to collect the insurance of the unemployments, so that is a good news because I still have money to watch the TV. I am many luck to have this kind of good friend. But this is not why I make the writting of this post now.

The new season of the hockey is come soon, but The Punks do not want me to write about this. They say no one in America has a like of the hockey even for the playoff, so why I will write about the regular season? Instead they ask me to cover another sport, and since we are in America the only option is to make talk about the anyfell footballs.

The first part of the anyfell is always a very big deal called The Daft. It has this name because of the many stupid, spoiled college children who start to make a billion of U.S. dollars on this day for no reason except of the anyfell player union. I wish our anyshell union in the hockey was so good as this because the college children who go in the hockey do not make any of the money or even have the dental insurance. A union like this could help before very much during the anyshell LOCKOUT, not strike. But I suppose it is a good thing for the anyfell children to make this money right away since many of them are never good at the actual playings of the footballs, so they must make all their monies in a short time.


See? The Daft. As I tell you.

But then there is a break of many month after The Daft when every body must watch the news of all the veteran player make what they call the holdup. The holdup is when a player sign already before a contract to be making a billion U.S. dollars, then after they sign it they think they should make two or three billion of the U.S. dollars instead because they are many special and have many anger at the new college child of the team who makes a higher money only for sitting on the bench and not making the play. There is an argue about this and the holdup man stay on vacation while all other player of the team start the practicing. The end of the holdup happen when the owner gives out the extra billion U.S. dollars to the veteran, and then the owner makes a raise of the prices for the ticket and the beer in the anyfell game to pay for the holdup. This is why they call it a holdup, because it is the robbery of the anyfell fans.

The thrird part of the anyfell year is making the occur at this moment. It is The Preseasoning. This is the time when there are games but no one makes the effort of a care to win it, yet the anyfell fan still must pay to watch. May sports have a Preseasoning, but the anyfell has the most worst. The only big news that happen in The Preseasoning of the anyfell is when the veteran man of the holdup is becomes l'injure in the first game and all the watchers at the anyfell stadium must think about how they pay so much money for ticket and beer for the salary of the holdup man and the college child that now sit on the bench next to each other for all season.

Beside that, there are so many of this games in The Preseasonings where there is no meaning and none of the anyfell player make the try to win, but the ESPN and Tony Kornholer want to make the anyfell fan think they should see this games anyway. So I have a time at my favorite bar of the sport down on the street and watch some games of The Preseasoning so I can report about it to you and you will know about all the news of l'import that happen in the anyfell. It is a possible that some of this informations are not completely right, because I did have a lot of the drinks at the bar while I watch, but I keep a good notes of what happen, so I think it is all most of the truth.

Biltamore Birds: 23
Washington Redmen: 3


He wears the new shirt, but the same look on his face.

This game is of an interest to the Punks because the new throwerback of the Redmen is Donaldvan McVick, who before this is many years on the Bird team of Phylerdelphia. But now he is old and the Phyler Birds have the brother of Donaldvan to play throwerback, the man who likes not the dogs so much. The owner of the Redmen always has a good time to pay too much money to the players who are not very good or always make l'injure, like this man. I think the owner gets so much of the enjoy from this because he must have the hatred for all anyfell fan who live around the Washington. Because as you see, the Redmen are still making the bad games.

Eagle Phylers: 3
Crouching Tigers: 23

"Hello. I still hate you."

This game shows what becomes of Donaldvan's brother, Michael McVick. He still can not have the good game, as when before he plays on the team of the Atlanta Birds. Why so many teams of bird names in the anyfell? Anyway, Terral Owens, the gay catcher man that used to catch the throw from Donaldvan, is now catch for the Tigers and he has a good game. He catches five or ten of the touchdowns, which in the footballs scores about one hundred points. In the hockey you only get one point when you score. Sorry, I know I am not supposed to make the compare of the hockey to the anyfell.

Green Way Packers: Twenty...eight?
Even More Birds: Probably About 24


If a man wears this clothes in the hockey, he will get l'injure from his own teammates.

This game is in the Seattle, where all year it is many rain. I am not so sure about why I make a note of this game. I think it is because the colors of neon green with mustard yellow on the TV makes my stomach to feel upset at the time I watch it. There is a stain of the vomit on my note page that makes a smudge of the ink I write with, so I think the true reason will be forever le mystery.

The Fishes: 200
The Cats: 199


This is how my stomach feel as I watch this preseasoning

More animal teams. More strange colors. More of the vomit on the note page. Sorry, this is all I know about this game.

One Team With: A Higher Score
Another Team With: A Lower Score


This is how I feel at the time of the last game at the bar.

Well I must make l'admission to you: I have at all no memory about this game. I only know the last part of my note smudge is for this game that is different from the other ones, and I feel the confidence that one of the teams made the win on the other team.

So I think there are still two more weeks of the Preseasoning that every body must watch. For some reason. Because I suppose three weeks of no caring about winning the games is not enough in the anyfell. There must be five weeks. Then the regular season will start. I never give the anyfell footballs many attention before, but this year I make a good try. As long as I keep making the receive of the unemployments and can buy alcohol at the bar of sport, I think I will like to do the watchings. See you next time, and many thank you to the readers at the Instapunk who are pay the taxes for my unemployments.




Thursday, August 26, 2010


A Decent Interval
Having Elapsed...


The ultimate liberal symbol

EMK REDUX. With all the other terrible stuff that's going on right now, I realize people might not be in the mood for a look back at Teddy Kennedy, but he's been in the col' col' ground for a while now, and maybe it's time to consider what his real legacy is.

Hmmm? Ya think? How about "perfect symbol of the left"? No way one could have pointed this out a year ago when he actually died, because conservatives are such docile wimps that it would never occur to them to call a spade a spade, and especially not when great conservative moralists like Orange Hatch loved him so much they just couldn't stand it when he died: 'O Thou Great Lberal Lion.' Because if there's one thing conservatives are good at, it's abandoning all our principles in the face of some event that allows us to weep on our sleeves like some wholesome whore at the State Fair.

Unless Instapunk, as usual, has always been pretty much right about everything. Including the fact that Teddy Kennedy was the perfect embodiment of all modern liberal political policy. That this fat, rich, spoiled, corrupt, gluttonous, drunken piece of shit was notable only for having been the ultimate exemplar of what's laughingly considered the party of the people. That this woman-abusing sociopathic narcissist, who never held down a real, work-requiring job in his worthless life, who destroyed the life of his first wife and solicited underage teenagers for sex from the window of his limousine, while making the lives of his own children a livng hell, who is nevertheless considered an icon of liberal politics and liberal vision and liberal leadership -- uh, uh, VOMIT -- was somehow admirable.

Well, he wasn't. Enough time has elapsed that we can now tell the truth. He was a piece of shit. A turd. And a smelly one at that.

But he was a symbol. From his manboobs and ballooning gluttony to his inarticulate screamings, he was everything the liberal wing of the Democratic Party has been for two generations -- a hypocritical epitome of voracious appetites, old ideas, old disproven policies, old causes, and old self-justifications for a life that anybody but a committed liberal would regard as a wasted sprawl in a gutterful of deadly sins.

Couldn't have said this a year ago. But if he really was a Catholic, he's in Hell now. You don't get to support 30 million abortions and still be a Catholic in good standing. You don't get to wait for a young woman to die underwater in a slowly disappearing air pocket while you noodle out your political career, FOR HOURS, and still go to heaven yourself, not even if you're a Shanty Irish Kennedy.

They laid him in repose and millions came to watch and adore him. They're just lucky he didn't burst into fucking flames on his catafalque.

What I couldn't say a year ago I'll say now. Teddy Kennedy was pure and absolute slime. We don't get to judge? Oh yes we do. God doesn't want us to be neutral about murderers. Or did you miss that part of the Old Testament?

Teddy Kennedy is so-called liberal America. Think about that. Think about that.




Wednesday, August 25, 2010


Our Amputated President

Yeah. He loves it. Who doesn't? But the evidence
suggests he's cut off from actual feelings. Amputee.

NOT RUN FOR A SECOND TERM? RIGHT. I can sense that people are distressed about the lack of Obama coverage here. He's mooning around at Martha's Vineyard, and the pundit pages are full of autopsies of his failed presidency and even those who are predicting he won't run for a second term. Less than two years in, folks. Don't believe the post-mortems. He's going to run again. He might even win.

Why? The MSM is still on his side. Think of them as the suicide bombers of the left. The power elites in government and universities and (did we mention?) government are still on his side. The feckless and dependent are still on his side, even the ones who can't get jobs right now, because they still think the government can tell business to hire the incompetent and indigent.

But here's the big question. Are the African-Americans still on his side? He won't be able to win without them. All the polls show they still like him, but will they actually come out to vote like last time? I think that's an open question. There are at least a couple reasons why they wouldn't.

Michelle's high life is not a problem. Nobody resents Shaq. This is America. When you hit the big time, live big.

It doesn't matter that the president talks white to white fund-raising audiences and black on the stump. We all gotta do what we gotta do.

It doesn't even matter that the current unemployment situation hits African-Americans the hardest. Or does it?

Thing is, this president isn't really an African-American. Now is he? In reality he's an American-African. Who just might be a muslim.

There are no polls showing what African-American Christians -- the overwhelming majority -- think of black muslims. There's no poll breakout I've seen of how many of the approximately 20 percent of Americans who think Obama is a muslim are African-American. And there's no poll showing what African-Americans might think of a politician whom they believe to be muslim but NOT a black muslim. Not Malcolm X but Osama Bin Laden.

You see, there's a potential tear in the monolithic support Obama has received from African-Americans. Because there's always been this big asterisk nobody wants to talk about. Obama is not African-American.

He's a half-white African who isn't doing all that damn much to put Americans back to work. And if you woke him up in the middle of the night, would he be able to recognize and identify this stuff?



John Rock was born to free African-American parents in Salem, New Jersey. Not much is known of his childhood. He taught in schools in New Jersey from 1844 to 1848. While teaching, he studied medicine. He apprenticed to two white doctors based in Salem: Dr. Shaw and Dr. Gibson; studying with practicing physicians was a common way to gain medical training.

Rock also sought entrance into medical school in 1848. He transferred into the field of dentistry and opened a dental practice in 1850. Finally gaining admittance to medical school, Rock graduated from American Medical College in Philadelphia in 1852. At the age of 27, he was a teacher, dentist, and physician. Of course, the first black physician in the U.S. was James Derham. And the first black attorney to argue before the Supreme Court was James Alexander Chiles.








Oh. You don't like tap dancing? Paternalistic and racist, is it? Does that mean Gregory Hines wasn't worth admiring? You tell me. Perhaps you'd prefer the first black novelist in this awful country?

B
Two points. No statue to me yet, and she has two nice points.

But, you see, this is all African-American stuff, and from the hidden corners at that. Names you mostly don't know if you're not actually from here. Obama know any of it? I doubt it. And, no, I'm not a birther. I'm just reminding you that Obama is from Hawaii, and he's probably learned about African-American culture the way most white people have, by mass media osmosis and by outsider curiosity. His taste in African-American art is certainly suspect. He prefers this...


to this...

Which is to say he's faking it. Paintings aren't about typography. They're about paint, vitally deployed.

Kinda brings me back to my original question. Will African-Americans stick with him the next time around? We'll see.





AMC Coming On


TEEVEE. I don't know if you get the American Movie Channel in your neck of the woods, but there's something very interesting going on there. This post is sort of half a blessing, but it's a fervent half if half is all it is. AllahPundit is fired up about a new AMC series called The Walking Dead, which I know for a fact Mrs. CP will never watch, but I might if it shows up On-Demand at Comcast. It's got elements of The Road Warrior and one of the more stellar cast members from the short-lived but highly original series Jericho (now re-running at odd times on SyFy).

Which I'm seizing on as an excuse for a very specific recommendation and a more general exhortation to pay close attention to what AMC is up to.

The specific recommendation is the new series Rubicon, previewed in the trailer above. It's a spy story, but not in the James Bond or Bourne mold. More like John Le Carre but without his hatred of everyone and everything that's ever lived. It's an old-fashioned, slow-developing espionage puzzle blessedly devoid of clicking keyboards and flashing computer graphics. The chief props are paper files, books, and note cards (plus one classic Norton motorcycle I once owned one of myself). The acting is extraordinary all round. Standouts include James Badge Dale in the lead role of an intelligence analyst not trained as an operative, Arliss Howard as his enigmatic boss, and the truly can't-look-away-from-him-when-he's-onscreen Michael Cristopher (Tony-winning writer and director) as the maybe villain of the piece. Oh. And Miranda Richardson too. You spend a lot of time watching James Dale thinking, and you're completely okay with that. I know I've recommended more than a few shows to our readership, but this is the first TV series I'm actually pissed off about the fact that I have to wait for the next episode. That's how good it is. Only problem is, I'm not sure you'll be able to catch up four episodes into it. (Lost chickens coming home to roost? Maybe.) And coincidentally (?), the latest major addition to the cast is another alum of the aforesaid Jericho. I'm hooked. It may turn out to be another liberal suitcase bomb against the Republican establishment, but I actually don't care for once. THAT's how good it is.

I first became aware of AMC's artistic ambitions with the western miniseries Broken Trail, starring Robert Duvall and Thomas Haden Church. I was very impressed by that effort. It seemed to me they were looking to honor the tradition of old-time classic movies within the freer time limits offered by television. They deliberately ignored the supposed bang-bang-bang action requirement of alphabet network series television, drew a deep breath, and hearkened back to the slower pace of Shane and The Searchers. As if  they were rediscovering character development, setting, mood, cinematography, and, well, composition. They realized television gave you the room within which to do these things, if you only had the nerve to learn from the old masters and take the time to do it without marquee faces, one-liners and cheap climaxes.

I said earlier that this is only half a blessing. I've tried and failed to appreciate such critically acclaimed AMC series as Breaking Bad and Mad Men. They don't do it for me. But I accept that I'm simply not the intended audience for those works. And I'm guessing they're drawing praise for the same reasons I like Broken Trail and Rubicon -- thoughtful writing, skilled actors rather than stars, and the kind of attention to cinematic detail that results in something more like a long-running movie than a TV show.

My opinion. For what it's worth.





Goodbye, Penny.

She just disappears. She was crazy. Never part of the story.
She just thought she was. In her crazy crazy ether dreams.

WE BENT OVER BACKWARDS TO ACCOMMODATE HER. NO MORE. Penny is banned. Hate to have to do it. But it's necessary. As long as she focused her bitterness and incoherent nastiness on me personally, we could absorb it. But she's moved on to attack other people we care about. Not a bad woman, perhaps, but a woman who needed to be put on a train and sent away.


"I wasn't quite as sick as I made out."
What needs to be done needs to be done.

She's on the train now. We'd never shoot a woman. Unless she tries to come back.




Tuesday, August 24, 2010


The Full Business: Ron Paul


THE DAFT DOCTOR. Boss wants me to post. I don't even remember the last time I posted. Let's see how rusty I am. Is this even the right website?

We at InstaPunk have taken shots at Ron Paul before, but we've never deigned to give everyone's favorite Republitarian the full business. The above video, posted yesterday by the Capitalism page on FaceBook, brings the doctor as close to relevance as he's likely to get anytime soon. Batter up!

The interview starts of strong enough, and Paul comes across as fairly lucid-- for a politician, at least. The best line of the piece starts at 4:42: "We have lost our understanding and confidence in how free markets work." He's right. And it explains a good chunk of this loon's appeal. Economics, and specifically capitalism, has been almost enitrely withheld from the last few generations. It simply hasn't been transmitted. It's been available, sure, but anyone who's wanted to learn it has, essentially, had to educate themselves from scratch. It should have been taught alongside history, and math, and cursive. In every year of K through 12. But it wasn't. Which has had a dual effect of victims of economics deprivation: Economics irritates them, and they have a sense that they need to know about it. Enter Ron Paul. Those who are at least somewhat educated can tell he's off his hinges, but he is clearly possessed of an understanding of economics. In that sense, it's good that the uneducated are drawn to him.

The interview-- and Paul-- falls apart after the commercial break. It starts off on a shakey foot. Paul addresses Moore as though the tub is simply misguided, as though he's fueled by a sincere desire to help the poor instead of simple Marxist envy. When InstaPunk warns us about niceness, this is what he's talking about. We shouldn't treat our foes as fair-minded just because we'd like them to be.

Which brings us to Afghanistan. First off, he fails to call Moore on the left's 180 on the morality of the Afghanistan operation. Has the congressman just not been paying attention?

Then the circus truly gets underway. It's just about impossible to overstate how irrational his isolationism is. At bottom, his position is, Leave the rest of the world alone, and they'll leave us alone. It's not just misguided. It's not just wishful thinking. It's irresponsible, malignantly dangerous buffoonery. And he has no excuse. Go back to 2:17. Listen to him describe the impact of the Singaporean and Indian markets on American hospitals. He knows that the rest of the world affects us. Why does he only allow the existence of non-American initiative when it strengthens his argument?

Because he's not a serious thinker. He's a show-off. A blowhard. A minstrel (not in a racist way, relax) for the more absurd stripes of libertarianism.

I have to admit. It's nice to have a politician who's even heard of the subjective theory of value, or the primacy of the individual. The "daft doctor" and the Paulistas are necessary steps in our civic evolution. But steps is all they are. And the first steps of a new development in any sphere are rickety, faulty, and practically scream their need for further improvement. The first car isn't even road worthy today. Montesquieu was an early, insightful pioneer of liberty, but any nation that followed his recommendations to the letter would collapse in short order. And I don't want to be within a hundred miles of the first hypodermic needle.

We need guys like Paul. We also need guys who are better than Paul. Lots of them. More than just this guy. And way better. And we need them fast.

As a palate cleanser, here's another video posted by Capitalism. One heralding the success of a more rational foreign policy.




Back to Archive Index

Amazon Honor System Contribute to InstaPunk.com Learn More