InstaPunk.Com

Archives

Wednesday, May 12, 2004

instapunk051204


Randi Rhodes looking cute and mischievous

PASSIONATE INTENSITY. If you're one of the 280 million or so Americans who haven't had a chance to listen to Franken's Folly (a.k.a. Air America), it's probably news to you that the most tempestuous little teapot in the lineup is a woman who calls herself Randi Rhodes. (Is my bias showing, or doesn't that sound rather like a pornstar monicker?) Thanks to the dutifulness of a handful of columnists who live in New York City, the Great Unwashed among us can at least read brief quotes of this doll's daily fulminations. For example:
The queen of venom, Randi Rhodes, followed Franken in the host slot. Her imitation of a cracker military type telling a soldier to "insert this fluorescent light bulb into that man's buttocks" was revolting. She compared U.S. prisons in Iraq to the "Nazi gulag" and said, "The day I say thank you to Rumsfeld is the same day I'll say thank you to the 12 people who raped me."

Rock bottom came when she compared Bush and his family to the Corleones in the "Godfather" saga. "Like Fredo, somebody ought to take him out fishing and phuw," she said, imitating the sound of gunfire.

There's more, and to be fair, Franken hasn't completely lost his light touch. The same article reports that he's gotten off some good ones about torture, pedophiles taking communion, and a bunch of new (well, not really) names for Rush Limbaugh. Ironically, the author of this little recital seems to hate Limbaugh as much as Franken does. Perhaps he's listened to Limbaugh as much as the rest of us have listened to Randi Rhodes. Still, my bet would be that we won't have Randi around to not listen to for much longer. So we'd better not listen to her while we can. Well, you know what I mean.


SELF-DELUSION. It's painful to read Andrew Sullivan these days. It used to be that he wrote reasonably about policy and politics, with occasional forays into the, for him, emotionally volatile subject of gay marriage. But since Massachusetts and San Francisco raised the specter of a constitutional crisis about marriage, it's just about all he can think about. He pretends to be weighing the relative strengths and weaknesses of Bush and Kerry, as if he were performing some kind of rational calculus. What is transparently obvious to an increasing number of his readers, however, is that he is desperately searching for an excuse to throw his weight behind John Kerry, a man he knows to be weak, hypocritical, and undistinguished. Yet Kerry's ability to pander to every politically correct fad makes him seem like the road to happiness if gay marriage is the only thing on your mind.

The coup de grace in the descent of a superior intellect to idiocy was delivered in Sullivan's latest column for The New Republic. This once unflinching champion of the war on terror has now devised a workaround for his preferred candidate's career-long record of appeasement: prop up Kerry with McCain in the role of VP. He begins by reasserting his long, and utterly unfounded, faith in the unstable and self-obsessed publicity hound from Arizona. Then he proceeds to offer up a truly ridiculous proposition:

He could become for Kerry what Cheney has been for Bush: a confidant, a manager, a strategic mind, a guide through the thicket of war-management. But he could also be more for Kerry: He could be a unifying force in the country in the dark days ahead.

Domestically, a Kerry-McCain ticket would also go a long way toward healing the Vietnam wound, now rubbed raw again by recent events in Iraq. The two men represent very different responses to that war, and could help unite their generation -- finally! -- over it.


Sigh. What all is wrong with these few sentences? Practically everything. McCain the politician is hardly anyone's guide through a thicket of anything. He threw himself out of the presidential race in 2000 by blowing his stack in public much the way Howard Dean did. His fellow senators aren't fond of him. Quite a few of us in the general public -- Republicans and Democrats alike -- are under the impression he's slightly nuts. He's a "unifying force" only if the constituencies you wish to unify are Andrew Sullivan and Chris Matthews.

But these are mere quibbles compared to the red flag Sullivan hoists in his next paragraph. Think about it. We're being asked to believe that the country will "finally" get over the Vietnam War if we put in charge the very two men who seem most obsessed with that war. Name any two other politicians who appear more likely to eat, sleep, and dream Vietnam every day of their lives. Imagine the policy discussions in the Oval Office:

"This latest thing in Iraq is the Tet offensive all over again."

"No, it's not. It's Qe Sanh."

"Tet."

"Qe Sanh."

"Tet."

"You say that one more time, I'm going to frag you myself."

Mr.Sullivan, if you want to back Kerry because you think he'll cave in on the gay issues you care about, go ahead. Everyone's entitled to be a one-issue candidate on occasion. But please spare us this kind of lunacy. There's always the danger that someone might actually listen to you. And that would be a disaster for the nation.







TBB Home Page
Home Page
InstaPunk.com
InstaPunk.com
TBB and 9-11
TBB & 9-11
TBB Stuff for YOU
TBB Shop

Amazon Honor System Contribute to InstaPunk.com Learn More